Cited by 55Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

African American Women’s Perceptions of Mindfulness Meditation Training and Gendered Race-Related Stress

Watson, Natalie N., Black, Angela R., Hunter, Carla D.·2016·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-016-0539-3

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watson, N. N., Black, A. R., & Hunter, C. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Watson, Natalie N.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2016-04-22
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
1034-1043
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2336201770
Cited by
55
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (T32AT006956)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR000427)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
African American women, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, Health Belief Model, cultural congruence, stigma, intervention engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review