Cited by 43Advanced Cellulose Research StudiesNatural Fiber Reinforced CompositesNanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Synthesis of phosphoric acid-treated sugarcane bagasse cellulose nanocrystal and its thermal properties enhancement for poly (lactic acid) nanocomposites

Gan, Ivy, Chow, Wen Shyang·2019·Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials

Abstract

Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) nanocomposites film reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) extracted from sugarcane bagasse fibre (SBF) was prepared by solvent casting method. The CNCs were obtained through alkaline treatment followed by sulphuric acid hydrolysis or phosphoric acid hydrolysis. The aim of this work was to evaluate the feasibility of utilizing phosphoric acid (mild acid) to extract CNC from the SBF. The properties of the CNC were investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The thermal properties of the PLA/CNC nanocomposites were characterized using thermogravimetric analyser (TGA). TEM results demonstrated that the CNC having diameter of 5.5–6.2 nm and length of 235–300 nm. Results from XPS characterization have confirmed the existence of both sulphate group and phosphate group in the H 2 SO 4 -treated CNC (S-CNC) and H 3 PO 4 -treated CNC (P-CNC). FTIR results indicated that the presence of hydrogen bonding and chemical interaction between PLA and CNC. The thermal stability of PLA/P-CNC-10 is higher than that of PLA/S-CNC-10 nanocomposites attributed to the char formation of P-CNC in the PLA matrix.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0892705718772866

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Xiong W, 2017, J Thermoplast Compos Mater, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gan, I., & Chow, W. S.
Affiliations
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Chow, Wen Shyang
Venue
Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials
Published
2018-05-01
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
619-634
ISSN
  • 0892-7057 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-7980
OpenAlex
W2801070198
Cited by
43
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universiti Sains Malaysia (Research University grant (1001/PBAHAN/8014024))
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
Keywords
cellulose nanocrystals, phosphoric acid hydrolysis, sulfuric acid hydrolysis, alkali treatment, thermal stability, char formation, cellulose surface modification, hydrogen bonding, biodegradable polymers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review