Racialized Debts: Racial Exclusion From Credit Tools and Information Networks
Abstract
Research on debt highlights its use as a tool for investment and a substitute for public welfare programs. Use of debt, however, is not equal across social groups. Black households in particular have lower debt levels than white households. In this paper, we explore the context behind massive racial disparities in household debt. Conceptually, we propose that personal debt is an indicator of integration in the financial system. As such, we argue that black households’ lower debt levels can be understood as financial isolation rather than financial health. We support this argument by using data from the Survey of Consumer Finances to estimate racial differences in access to financial tools net of racial differences in socioeconomic status, asset levels, and financial literacy. We also show that black households’ financial information networks are different from white households’ in ways that suggest restricted access to formal financial institutions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People of color are more likely to be burdened by medical or predatory debt, and to be in default on other types of debt.
“are more likely to be burdened by medical or predatory debt, and to be in default on other types of debt (Charron-Chénier & Seamster, 2020; Seamster, 2019).”
From Debt, Incarceration, and Re-entry: a Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as Charron-Chénier & Seamster, 2020
Cites
The Economic Importance of Financial Literacy: Theory and Evidence
Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.52.1.5 · Cited by 4,698 · see citing works
Racial Segregation and the American Foreclosure Crisis
Rugh, J. S., & Massey, D. S. (2010) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122410380868 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Seamster, L. (2019) · Contexts · doi:10.1177/1536504219830674 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Debt, Incarceration, and Re-entry: a Scoping Review
Harper, A., Ginapp, C., Bardelli, T., Grimshaw, A., Justen, M., Mohamedali, A., Thomas, I., & Puglisi, L. (2021) · American Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1007/s12103-020-09559-9 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
- Authors
- Charron-Chénier, R., & Seamster, L.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University, USA
- University of Iowa (US)
- Venue
- Critical Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-02-05
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 977-992
- ISSN
- 0896-9205 (ISSN-L)
- 1569-1632
- OpenAlex
- W3005409577
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 6.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Critical Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
- Keywords
- Black households, financial exclusion, access to credit, personal debt, financial integration, racial inequality, financial institutions, financial literacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review