Cited by 44Housing, Finance, and NeoliberalismFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies

Racialized Debts: Racial Exclusion From Credit Tools and Information Networks

Charron-Chénier, Raphaël, Seamster, Louise·2021·Critical Sociology

Abstract

Research on debt highlights its use as a tool for investment and a substitute for public welfare programs. Use of debt, however, is not equal across social groups. Black households in particular have lower debt levels than white households. In this paper, we explore the context behind massive racial disparities in household debt. Conceptually, we propose that personal debt is an indicator of integration in the financial system. As such, we argue that black households’ lower debt levels can be understood as financial isolation rather than financial health. We support this argument by using data from the Survey of Consumer Finances to estimate racial differences in access to financial tools net of racial differences in socioeconomic status, asset levels, and financial literacy. We also show that black households’ financial information networks are different from white households’ in ways that suggest restricted access to formal financial institutions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0896920519894635

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People of color are more likely to be burdened by medical or predatory debt, and to be in default on other types of debt.

    “are more likely to be burdened by medical or predatory debt, and to be in default on other types of debt (Charron-Chénier & Seamster, 2020; Seamster, 2019).”

    From Debt, Incarceration, and Re-entry: a Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as Charron-Chénier & Seamster, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Charron-Chénier, R., & Seamster, L.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University, USA
  • University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Critical Sociology
Published
2020-02-05
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
977-992
ISSN
  • 0896-9205 (ISSN-L)
  • 1569-1632
OpenAlex
W3005409577
Cited by
44
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Critical Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Keywords
Black households, financial exclusion, access to credit, personal debt, financial integration, racial inequality, financial institutions, financial literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review