Cited by 47Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchVeterinary Medicine and SurgeryDental Health and Care Utilization

Oral Health Benefits of a Daily Dental Chew in Dogs

Quest, Bradley W.·2013·Journal of Veterinary Dentistry

Abstract

An independent study was conducted to determine and quantify the oral care benefits of a daily edible dental chew in dogs as measured by plaque and calculus control, gingival indices, and oral malodor. A “clean mouth” test model was used comparing a commercial dry diet and a commercial dry diet plus one dental chew per day. The dental chew tested was representative of a retail canine dental chew. The test dental chew was a green-colored dental dog chew with a flexible texture that can be readily chewed by dogs. They are made with a knuckle bone shape on one end and a toothbrush shape on the other end. Sixty adult dogs were allocated in either control or test groups based on plaque stratification and studied for 28-days. The test group (30 dogs) received a dry diet and 1 dental chew each day. The control group (30 dogs) received the same dry diet only. At the end of the study, measurements of plaque and calculus accumulation and evaluations of oral malodor and gingival heath were performed. Adding a dental chew to the diet resulted in statistically significant reductions in plaque and calculus accumulation, and oral malodor while improving gingival indices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/089875641303000203

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wild animals have superior oral health status to animals living in captivity because of the absence of masticatory challenge among foods given to domestic and captive animals.

    “Wild animals have an oral health status superior to that of animals living in captivity because of the absence of masticatory challenge among foods given to domestic and captive animals.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quest, B. W.
Affiliations
From Nutro/Greenies Company, 1315 N Chouteau Trafficway, Kansas City, MO, 64120
Corresponding author
Quest, Bradley W.
Venue
Journal of Veterinary Dentistry
Published
2013-06
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
84-87
ISSN
  • 0898-7564 (ISSN-L)
  • 2470-4083
OpenAlex
W205904739
Cited by
47
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Veterinary Dentistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
Keywords
dogs, dental plaque, dental calculus, gingival health, halitosis, oral care, canine oral health
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Dental Calculus, Dental Deposits, Dental Plaque, Dental Plaque Index, Dog Diseases, Dogs, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gingivitis, Halitosis, Male, Oral Hygiene, Oral Hygiene Index, Periodontal Index, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review