The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Governance of Nonprofit Organizations: Integrating Agency Theory With Stakeholder and Stewardship Theories
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to provide a more comprehensive principal–agent theory of nonprofit organizations by combining agency theory with aspects of stakeholder theory, stewardship theory, and empirical literature on the governance and management of nonprofit organizations. First, the use of a stakeholder perspective allows us to identify the principals of a nonprofit organization and to divide nonprofit principal–agent relationships into different categories. Next, we discuss the assumptions and prescriptions of agency theory and stewardship theory and suggest that a complementary use of these theories can contribute to the research of principal–agent relationships. By discussing empirical literature from a stewardship–agency perspective, we are able to address issues of nonprofit accountability. We conclude by giving suggestions for further research and by stressing the importance of a recruitment policy to avoid internal agency problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving
Andreoni, J. (1990) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234133 · Cited by 5,825
Moving beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences
Rowley, T. J. (1997) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9711022107 · Cited by 2,522
Cited by
Saxton, G. D., & Guo, C. (2011) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0899764009341086 · Cited by 338
Bacq, S., & Eddleston, K. A. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3317-1 · Cited by 265
Social return on investment in the public sector
Vluggen, R., Kuijpers, R., Semeijn, J., & Gelderman, C. J. (2020) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-06-2018-0023 · Cited by 46
Willems, E. L., Van Puyvelde, S., Jegers, M., & Raeymaeckers, P. (2022) · Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management · doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12421 · Cited by 11
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Puyvelde, S., Caers, R., Du Bois, C., & Jegers, M.
- Venue
- Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-05-31
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 431-451
- ISSN
- 0094-0607 (ISSN-L)
- 0899-7640
- 1552-7395
- OpenAlex
- W2148878258
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 31.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Governance of Nonprofit Organizations: Integrating Agency Theory With Stakeholder and Stewardship Theories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0899764011409757
- The paper
- Van Puyvelde, S., Caers, R., Du Bois, C., & Jegers, M. (2012). The Governance of Nonprofit Organizations: Integrating Agency Theory With Stakeholder and Stewardship Theories. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764011409757
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.