Cited by 46Public Procurement and PolicyPublic Policy and Administration ResearchCommunity Development and Social Impact

Social return on investment in the public sector

Open access
Vluggen, Rob, Kuijpers, Relus, Semeijn, Janjaap, Gelderman, Cees J.·2020·Journal of Public Procurement

Abstract

Purpose: Social return on investment (SROI) is a systematic way of incorporating social values of different stakeholders into public sector decision-making on sustainability. This study aims to identify salient factors that influence SROI implementation. Design/methodology/approach: The interactions of four Dutch municipalities and their social enterprises were examined, by analyzing relevant documents and interviewing key actors. Findings: External forces appear to have little influence on SROI implementation. Management systems, legal restrictions in relation to privacy and the administrative burden appear to hinder SROI implementation. Findings suggest that trust among the parties involved and their representatives is a major driver for SROI development. SROI is not measured well enough, which complicates analyzing and reporting its development. Research limitations/implications: Achieving collaboration through trust is a characteristic of stewardship theory, and therefore useful for studying social sustainability. Combining agency and stewardship theory provides useful insights concerning the application of control mechanisms versus empowerment. Practical implications: Barriers can be overcome by informing and engaging suppliers in SROI initiatives. Furthermore, findings of this study suggest that it is easier for municipalities to incorporate SROI when social firm activities are insourced. An independent procurement function stimulates SROI development. Engaged professionals can make the difference in SROI policy implementation, more so than written policies. Social implications: SROI enables social sustainability. SROI can be used by public agencies to provide meaningful activities for the long-term unemployed and underprivileged adolescents. Originality/value: The study is the first empirical work that relates public procurement to SROI implementation and its effect on suppliers. The findings provide valuable insights into government influence on social enterprises.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/jopp-06-2018-0023

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vluggen, R., Kuijpers, R., Semeijn, J., & Gelderman, C. J.
Affiliations
Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
Venue
Journal of Public Procurement
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2020-04-15
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
235-264
ISSN
  • 1535-0118 (ISSN-L)
  • 2150-6930
OpenAlex
W3020672786
Cited by
46
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
7.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Public Procurement (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Community Development and Social Impact
Keywords
social return on investment, social enterprises, public sector decision-making, social sustainability, municipalities, public procurement, trust, stewardship theory, agency theory, implementation barriers, supplier involvement, insourcing, long-term unemployed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review