Cited by 48Machine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in HealthcareSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Improving clinical outcome predictions using convolution over medical entities with multimodal learning

Open access
Bardak, Batuhan, Tan, Mehmet·2021·Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Abstract

Early prediction of mortality and length of stay (LOS) of a patient is vital for saving a patient's life and management of hospital resources. Availability of Electronic Health Records (EHR) makes a huge impact on the healthcare domain and there are several works on predicting clinical problems. However, many studies did not benefit from the clinical notes because of the sparse, and high dimensional nature. In this work, we extract medical entities from clinical notes and use them as additional features besides time-series features to improve proposed model predictions. The proposed convolution based multimodal architecture, which not only learns effectively combining medical entities and time-series Intensive Care Unit (ICU) signals of patients but also allows to compare the effect of different embedding techniques such as Word2vec and FastText on medical entities. Results show that the proposed deep multimodal method outperforms all other baseline models including multimodal architectures and improves the mortality prediction performance for Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics (AUROC) and Area Under Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) by around 3%. For LOS predictions, there is an improvement of around 2.5% over the time-series baseline. The code for the proposed method is available at https://github.com/tanlab/ConvolutionMedicalNer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102112

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A major barrier remains the isolation of modality-specific processing pipelines, where structured and unstructured clinical data are often treated as separate streams rather than synergistically integrated components.

    “A major barrier remains the isolation of modality-specific processing pipelines, where structured and unstructured clinical data are often treated as separate streams rather than synergistically integrated components (Bardak and Tan, 2021; Fan et al., 2024).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5][5] Edward Choi, Mohammad Taha Bahadori, Andy Schuetz, Walter F Stewart, and Jimeng Sun. Doctor ai: Predicting clinical events via recurrent neural networks. In Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference , pages 301-318, 2016. -
  2. [54][54] Mark Neumann, Daniel King, Iz Beltagy, and Waleed Ammar. Scispacy: Fast and robust models for biomedical natural language processing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.07669 , 2019. - · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bardak, B., & Tan, M.
Affiliations
TOBB University of Economics and Technology (TR)
Corresponding author
Tan, Mehmet
Venue
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
117
Pages
102112
ISSN
0933-3657 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3160359732
Cited by
48
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (120E173)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
mortality prediction, length of stay prediction, clinical notes, medical entity extraction, multimodal learning, convolutional neural networks, electronic health records, word embeddings, Word2Vec, FastText, clinical outcome prediction
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Prognosis, ROC Curve, Area Under Curve, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review