Cited by 80Spatial Cognition and NavigationSexual Differentiation and DisordersGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities

Having a Male Co-Twin Masculinizes Mental Rotation Performance in Females

Open access
Vuoksimaa, Eero, Kaprio, Jaakko, Kremen, William S., Hokkanen, Laura, Viken, Richard J., Tuulio-Henriksson, Annamari, Rose, Richard J.·2010·Psychological Science

Abstract

Probably the most robust cognitive sex difference is that, on average, males outperform females in tests of mental rotation ability (Voyer, Voyer, & Bryden, 1995). This sex difference is evident across many different cultures (Silverman, Choi, & Peters, 2007), and it appears early in infancy, at 3 to 5 months of age (Moore & Johnson, 2008; Quinn & Liben, 2008). Studies have suggested that elevated levels of fluctuating testosterone are associated with better spatial abilities among females, whereas in males, lower fluctuating testosterone levels relate to better spatial abilities (Gouchie & Kimura, 1991; Moffat & Hampson, 1996). In persons with congenital adrenal hyperplasia, which usually affects the production of sex steroids, the organizational effects of elevated prenatal testosterone may account for improved spatial test performance in females and impaired spatial test performance in males (Puts, McDaniel, Jordan, & Breedlove, 2008). Moreover, a positive relationship between mental rotation test (MRT) performance and prenatal testosterone has been reported in healthy girls (Grimshaw, Sitarenios, & Finegan, 1995). Animal studies have shown that female fetuses located adjacent to male fetuses in the uterus can be masculinized through prenatal exposure to testosterone (Ryan & Vandenbergh, 2002). In humans, prenatal masculinization can be studied by comparing female twins from opposite-sex twin pairs with female twins from same-sex pairs. Sisters of twin brothers have been reported to be masculinized in physiological traits, including maternal fitness (Lummaa, Pettay, & Russell, 2007) and second-to-fourth-finger ratio (van Anders, Vernon, & Wilbur, 2006), but other studies have not demonstrated the same results (Medland, Loehlin, & Martin, 2008; Medland, Loehlin, Willemsen, et al., 2008). One commonly cited study concerns mental rotation ability in female twins from opposite- and same-sex pairs (Cole-Harding, Morstad, & Wilson, 1988); however, this study was published only as a meeting abstract. In the study reported here, we assessed masculinization effects on MRT performance among female twins with male co-twins by comparing their performance with that of female twins with female co-twins. We also investigated whether or not there are differences in MRT performance between males with female co-twins and males with male co-twins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797610376075

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vuoksimaa, E., Kaprio, J., Kremen, W. S., Hokkanen, L., Viken, R. J., Tuulio-Henriksson, A., & Rose, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
Corresponding author
Vuoksimaa, Eero
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2010-06-25
Volume
21
Issue
8
Pages
1069-1071
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2097889371
Cited by
80
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
13.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA12502, K05AA000145, R01AA012502, R01AA009203, R37AA012502)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG022982, R01AG022381, R01AG018386)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Keywords
mental rotation, prenatal testosterone, female twins, twin pairs, sex differences in cognition, prenatal androgen exposure, congenital adrenal hyperplasia, maternal fitness, hemispheric lateralization, handedness
MeSH terms
Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Rotation, Sex Characteristics, Sex Factors, Space Perception, Twins, Dizygotic, Masculinity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review