Cited by 354Cultural Differences and ValuesPersonality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

On “Feeling Right” in Cultural Contexts: How Person-Culture Match Affects Self-Esteem and Subjective Well-Being

Fulmer, C. Ashley, Gelfand, Michele J., Kruglanski, Arie W., Kim-Prieto, Chu, Diener, Ed, Pierro, Antonio, Higgins, E. Tory·2010·Psychological Science

Abstract

Whether one is in one's native culture or abroad, one's personality can differ markedly from the personalities of the majority, thus failing to match the "cultural norm." Our studies examined how the interaction of individual- and cultural-level personality affects people's self-esteem and well-being. We propose a person-culture match hypothesis that predicts that when a person's personality matches the prevalent personalities of other people in a culture, culture functions as an important amplifier of the positive effect of personality on self-esteem and subjective well-being at the individual level. Across two studies, using data from more than 7,000 individuals from 28 societies, multilevel random-coefficient analyses showed that when a relation between a given personality trait and well-being or self-esteem exists at the individual level, the relation is stronger in cultures characterized by high levels of that personality dimension. Results were replicated across extraversion, promotion focus, and locomotive regulatory mode. Our research has practical implications for the well-being of both cultural natives and migrants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797610384742

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 354

Authors
Fulmer, C. A., Gelfand, M. J., Kruglanski, A. W., Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E., Pierro, A., & Higgins, E. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • The College of New Jersey
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Fulmer, C. Ashley
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2010-09-28
Volume
21
Issue
11
Pages
1563-1569
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2148128846
Cited by
354
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 18
FWCI
21.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Army Research Office
  • Army Research Laboratory
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
personality, cultural norms, self-esteem, subjective well-being, extraversion, promotion focus, cross-cultural comparison, migrants, personality traits
MeSH terms
Character, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Extraversion, Psychological, Humans, Models, Psychological, Quality of Life, Self Concept, Social Environment, Social Identification, Social Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review