Cited by 341Face Recognition and PerceptionFace recognition and analysisEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Holistic Processing Predicts Face Recognition

Open access
Richler, Jennifer J., Cheung, Olivia S., Gauthier, Isabel·2011·Psychological Science

Abstract

The concept of holistic processing is a cornerstone of face-recognition research. In the study reported here, we demonstrated that holistic processing predicts face-recognition abilities on the Cambridge Face Memory Test and on a perceptual face-identification task. Our findings validate a large body of work that relies on the assumption that holistic processing is related to face recognition. These findings also reconcile the study of face recognition with the perceptual-expertise work it inspired; such work links holistic processing of objects with people’s ability to individuate them. Our results differ from those of a recent study showing no link between holistic processing and face recognition. This discrepancy can be attributed to the use in prior research of a popular but flawed measure of holistic processing. Our findings salvage the central role of holistic processing in face recognition and cast doubt on a subset of the face-perception literature that relies on a problematic measure of holistic processing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797611401753

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richler, J. J., Cheung, O. S., & Gauthier, I.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University
Corresponding author
Richler, Jennifer J.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2011-03-10
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
464-471
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2128854499
Cited by
341
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 27
FWCI
15.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY013441, P30EY008126)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
holistic processing, face recognition (cognition), face memory, Cambridge Face Memory Test, perceptual expertise, face individuation, face perception
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cognition, Face, Female, Humans, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review