A “Present” for the Future: The Unexpected Value of Rediscovery
Abstract
Although documenting everyday activities may seem trivial, four studies reveal that creating records of the present generates unexpected benefits by allowing future rediscoveries. In Study 1, we used a time-capsule paradigm to show that individuals underestimate the extent to which rediscovering experiences from the past will be curiosity provoking and interesting in the future. In Studies 2 and 3, we found that people are particularly likely to underestimate the pleasure of rediscovering ordinary, mundane experiences, as opposed to extraordinary experiences. Finally, Study 4 demonstrates that underestimating the pleasure of rediscovery leads to time-inconsistent choices: Individuals forgo opportunities to document the present but then prefer rediscovering those moments in the future to engaging in an alternative fun activity. Underestimating the value of rediscovery is linked to people’s erroneous faith in their memory of everyday events. By documenting the present, people provide themselves with the opportunity to rediscover mundane moments that may otherwise have been forgotten.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People seem to enjoy rediscovering records of their past experiences; this applies to special and extraordinary experiences and also to mundane everyday ones that may otherwise have been forgotten.
“Moreover, people seem to enjoy rediscovering records of their past experiences; interestingly, this not only applies to special and extraordinary experiences but also to mundane everyday ones that may otherwise have been forgotten (Zhang et al., 2014).”
From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Zhang et al., 2014
Cites
Duration neglect in retrospective evaluations of affective episodes.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Kahneman, D. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.45 · Cited by 1,228 · see citing works
Happiness from Ordinary and Extraordinary Experiences
Bhattacharjee, A., & Mogilner, C. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/674724 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Twenge, J. M., & Foster, J. D. (2010) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550609355719 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Schmolck, H., Buffalo, E. A., & Squire, L. R. (2000) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00212 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Positive interventions: An emotion regulation perspective.
Quoidbach, J., Mikolajczak, M., & Gross, J. J. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0038648 · Cited by 546 · see citing works
The digital expansion of the mind: Implications of internet usage for memory and cognition.
Marsh, E. J., & Rajaram, S. (2019) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.11.001 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model
Hutmacher, F., Appel, M., & Schwan, S. (2024) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2024.2384125 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, T., Kim, T., Brooks, A. W., Gino, F., & Norton, M. I.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Harvard Business School, Harvard University
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-08-29
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1851-1860
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2139190168
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior
- Keywords
- time capsule, memory confidence, time inconsistency, self-documentation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Forecasting, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Young Adult, Pleasure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review