Cited by 122Personality Traits and PsychologyEmotions and Moral BehaviorSocial and Intergroup Psychology

You Call It “Self-Exuberance”; I Call It “Bragging”: Miscalibrated Predictions of Emotional Responses to Self-Promotion

Scopelliti, Irene, Loewenstein, George, Vosgerau, Joachim·2015·Psychological Science

Abstract

People engage in self-promotional behavior because they want others to hold favorable images of them. Self-promotion, however, entails a trade-off between conveying one's positive attributes and being seen as bragging. We propose that people get this trade-off wrong because they erroneously project their own feelings onto their interaction partners. As a consequence, people overestimate the extent to which recipients of their self-promotion will feel proud of and happy for them, and underestimate the extent to which recipients will feel annoyed (Experiments 1 and 2). Because people tend to promote themselves excessively when trying to make a favorable impression on others, such efforts often backfire, causing targets of self-promotion to view self-promoters as less likeable and as braggarts (Experiment 3).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797615573516

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Narcissists may become disliked for their bragging.

    “Indeed, narcissists may become disliked for their bragging (Scopelliti et al., 2015).”

    From The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit (2020) · cites this paper as Scopelliti et al., 2015

  • Entitled self-views are associated with overestimating the competence and underestimating the combativeness that individuals display when pursuing status.

    “Research suggests that this might be the case, as entitled self-views are associated with an overestimation of the competence—and underestimation of the combativeness—that individuals display when pursuing status (Lange, Redford, & Crusius, 2018; Scopelliti, Loewenstein, & Vosgerau, 2015).”

    From The "Why" and "How" of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic Status Pursuit (2020) · cites this paper as Scopelliti, Loewenstein, & Vosgerau, 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scopelliti, I., Loewenstein, G., & Vosgerau, J.
Affiliations
  • City, University of London (GB)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Bocconi University (IT)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2015-05-07
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
903-914
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2123760316
Cited by
122
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
self-promotion, bragging, impression management, self-presentation, backfire effect
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Female, Happiness, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Male, Middle Aged, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review