Cited by 91Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorSocial Power and Status DynamicsManagement and Organizational Studies

Amplifying Voice in Organizations

Open access
Bain, Kristin, Kreps, Tamar A., Meikle, Nathan L., Tenney, Elizabeth R.·2021·Academy of Management Journal

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We extend the field’s understanding of voice recognition by examining peer responses to voice. We investigate how employees can help peers get a status boost from voicing, while also raising their ...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amj.2018.0621

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prohibitive voice is more likely to be interpreted as personal criticism or blame, often provoking defensiveness or discomfort in recipients, particularly when it challenges the status quo or implicates leaders' decisions.

    “Because of its critical and risk-oriented nature, prohibitive voice is more likely to be interpreted as personal criticism or blame, often provoking defensiveness or discomfort in recipients—particularly when it challenges the status quo or implicates leaders’ decisions9–12.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Bain, K., Kreps, T. A., Meikle, N. L., & Tenney, E. R.
Affiliations
  • Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
2021-08
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
1288-1312
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W3154097269
Cited by
91
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
11.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
employee voice, voice recognition, status, organizational voice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review