The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Experience of Empathy in Everyday Life
Open accessAbstract
We used experience sampling to examine perceptions of empathy in the everyday lives of a group of 246 U.S. adults who were quota sampled to represent the population on key demographics. Participants reported an average of about nine opportunities to empathize per day; these experiences were positively associated with prosocial behavior, a relationship not found with trait measures. Although much of the literature focuses on the distress of strangers, in everyday life, people mostly empathize with very close others, and they empathize with positive emotions 3 times as frequently as with negative emotions. Although trait empathy was negatively associated only with well-being, empathy in daily life was generally associated with increased well-being. Theoretically distinct components of empathy—emotion sharing, perspective taking, and compassion—typically co-occur in everyday empathy experiences. Finally, empathy in everyday life was higher for women and the religious but not significantly lower for conservatives and the wealthy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · Cited by 86,835
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
Davis, M. H. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · Cited by 10,272
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454
The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors
Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91 · Cited by 2,672
Singer, T., & Klimecki, O. M. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.054 · Cited by 1,254
Is there a core neural network in empathy? an fMRI based quantitative meta-analysis
Fan, Y., Duncan, N. W., de Greck, M., & Northoff, G. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.10.009 · Cited by 902
Decety, J., Bartal, I. B.-A., Uzefovsky, F., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0077 · Cited by 740
Hofmann, W., Wisneski, D. C., Brandt, M. J., & Skitka, L. J. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1251560 · Cited by 575
Sample Size Planning for Statistical Power and Accuracy in Parameter Estimation
Maxwell, S. E., Kelley, K., & Rausch, J. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093735 · Cited by 542
Hall, J. A., & Schwartz, R. (2019) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2018.1477442 · Cited by 370
Cited by
Goldenberg, A. (2024) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916231179154 · Cited by 14
Reading and Empathy: Qualitative insights into adolescents' experiences with fiction books
Santi, E., Cebula, K., & McGeown, S. (2025) · Literacy · doi:10.1111/lit.70006 · Cited by 7
“Empathy is a key skill and process considered important for supporting and deepening adolescents ’ understanding of others ’ emotions, perspectives and experiences, thus contributing to their social and emotional intelligence (Depow et al., 2021).”
Being a Parent Helps Being a Benevolent Leader: A Mixed-Method Approach
Liu, Z., Liang, Z., Wang, C., & Bian, W. (2025) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-024-05757-1 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Depow, G. J., Francis, Z., & Inzlicht, M.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-07-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1198-1213
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W3162940003
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 24.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Experience of Empathy in Everyday Life. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0956797621995202
- The paper
- Depow, G. J., Francis, Z., & Inzlicht, M. (2021). The Experience of Empathy in Everyday Life. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797621995202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
