Cited by 370Empathy and Medical EducationSocial and Intergroup PsychologyEmotions and Moral Behavior

Empathy present and future

Hall, Judith A., Schwartz, Rachel·2019·The Journal of Social Psychology

Abstract

The empathy concept has central significance for social and personality psychology and in many other domains, including neuroscience, clinical/abnormal psychology, and the health professions. However, the current diversity in conceptual and operational definitions, and the promiscuous use of the term "empathy," threaten the ability of researchers to advance the field. The present article provides a quantitative review and conceptual analysis of empathy definitions and usages by examining 393 studies published between 2001 and 2013, and 96 studies published in 2017. We document the prevalence and diversity of definitions, as well as inconsistencies between conceptual definitions and measurements employed. We discuss ways to refine the conceptualization and operationalization of the empathy construct, including for many purposes, bypassing the term empathy in favor of lower-level construct labels that more precisely describe what is actually being measured. In many cases we see no added theoretical or empirical value in applying the term empathy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00224545.2018.1477442

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 109 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hall, J. A., & Schwartz, R.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Hall, Judith A.
Venue
The Journal of Social Psychology
Published
2018-06-18
Volume
159
Issue
3
Pages
225-243
ISSN
  • 0022-4545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-1183
OpenAlex
W2804479262
Cited by
370
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
empathy, construct validity, measurement discrepancy, conceptual analysis
MeSH terms
Empathy, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Psychology, Social

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review