The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why do news values matter? Towards a new methodological framework for analysing news discourse in Critical Discourse Analysis and beyond
Abstract
This article introduces a new framework for the analysis of news discourse to scholars in Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and beyond. It emphasises the importance of news values for linguistic analysis and encourages a constructivist approach to their analysis. The new methodological framework is situated within what the authors call a ‘discursive’ approach to news values. From this perspective, news values are seen as values that exist in and are constructed through discourse, and the primary research interest is in how texts construct newsworthiness through multimodal resources. This article first introduces resources that are used to construe news values in English-language news discourse, before illustrating the framework through two case studies of a 70,000-word corpus of British news discourse. The framework itself is intended for both multimodal discourse analysis and corpus linguistic analysis, although this article focuses more on the integration of corpus linguistic techniques. Thus, the discursive approach ties in well with two recent trends in CDA – towards multimodal and towards corpus-assisted discourse analysis. More specifically, the case studies show that corpus linguistic techniques can identify conventionalised discursive devices that are repeatedly used in news discourse to construct and perpetuate an ideology of newsworthiness. They further show that such techniques can provide a useful indication of the discursive construction of newsworthiness around a specific topic, event or news actor. The article concludes with an outline of further applications of the framework for (critical) linguistic analyses of news discourse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/002234336500200104 · Cited by 3,428
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230511910 · Cited by 3,171
The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005) · Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) · Cited by 2,881
Language in the news: discourse and ideology in the press
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-1923 · Cited by 2,082
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., KhosraviNik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926508088962 · Cited by 1,931
How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction
Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2023) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781036212933 · Cited by 1,232
Thogmartin, C., & Bell, A. (1994) · Language · doi:10.2307/416501 · Cited by 991
Richardson, J. E. (2007) · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-20968-8 · Cited by 639
Evaluation in Media Discourse: Analysis of a Newspaper Corpus
Bednarek, M. A. (2006) · Cited by 538
Self-citationBednarek, M. (2008) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230285712 · Cited by 508
Self-citation
Cited by
Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies
Gillings, M., Mautner, G., & Baker, P. (2023) · doi:10.1017/9781009168144 · Cited by 146
A Figure is Worth a Thousand Words: The role of visualization in paradox theorizing
Pradies, C., Berti, M., Pina e Cunha, M., Rego, A., Tunarosa, A., & Clegg, S. (2023) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/01708406231161998 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Bednarek, M., & Caple, H.
- Venue
- Discourse & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-01-07
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 135-158
- ISSN
- 0957-9265 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3624
- OpenAlex
- W2162098349
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 554.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why do news values matter? Towards a new methodological framework for analysing news discourse in Critical Discourse Analysis and beyond. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0957926513516041
- The paper
- Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2014). Why do news values matter? Towards a new methodological framework for analysing news discourse in Critical Discourse Analysis and beyond. Discourse & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926513516041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.