Cited by 43Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory, History, Trauma, Identity

Nachträglichkeit : A Freudian perspective on delayed traumatic reactions

Bistoen, Gregory, Vanheule, Stijn, Craps, Stef·2014·Theory & Psychology

Abstract

The Freudian concept of Nachträglichkeit is central to the psychoanalytical understanding of trauma. However, it has not received much attention within the contemporary field of trauma studies. This paper attempts to reconstruct the logic inherent to this concept by examining Freud’s remarks on the case of Emma. Furthermore, it is argued that Nachträglichkeit offers an interesting perspective on both (a) the well-established yet controversial finding that traumatic reactions sometimes follow in the wake of non-Criterion A events (so-called minor stressors or life events) and (b) the often-neglected phenomenon of delayed-onset PTSD. These two phenomena will appear to be related in some instances. Nachträglichkeit clarifies one way in which traumatic encounters are mediated by subjective dimensions above and beyond the objective particularities of both the event and the person. It demonstrates that the subjective impact of an event is not given once and for all but is malleable by subsequent experiences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0959354314530812

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The impact of a traumatic event is not fixed but can be shaped by subsequent experiences, because the subjective perception of trauma is not given once and for all.

    “The Freudian concept of Nachträglichkeit, which can be translated as deferred action, suggests that the impact of a traumatic event is not fixed but rather can be shaped by subsequent experiences.This is because the subjective perception of the trauma is not given once and for all (Bistoen, Vanheule, S. & Craps, 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Bistoen, G., Vanheule, S., & Craps, S.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Venue
Theory & Psychology
Published
2014-04-21
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
668-687
ISSN
  • 0959-3543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7447
OpenAlex
W2111501822
Cited by
43
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Theory & Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universiteit Gent
  • Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
Keywords
Nachträglichkeit, Sigmund Freud, trauma, life events, delayed-onset PTSD, psychoanalytic theory of trauma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review