Cited by 7Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsMalaria Research and Control

Efficacy of hydroxychloroquine in the prevention of thromboembolic events: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Barros Edington, Fernando Luiz, de Rezende, Daniel Fraga, dos Santos, Luis Fernando Simões, Garcia, Rayssa Valandro, Gadelha, Sandra Rocha, Santiago, Mittermayer Barreto·2022·Lupus

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the risk ratio (RR) of thromboembolic events in chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine users compared to non-users. Methods: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs), using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to the present, reporting thromboembolic events in chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine users compared to non-users. Four authors independently screened all the records obtained through our search strategy and later revised the selected full-text articles for eligibility, according to our inclusion criteria. The same four authors independently extracted relevant data through a customized data collection form while two other authors assessed the quality of the included RCTs using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (Version 2.0). All the disagreements were resolved through discussions among the authors. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and its respective standard error of developing thromboembolic events in hydroxychloroquine users and non-users for each individual study and pooled the results using a random effects model meta-analysis. We assessed Heterogeneity using the Tau 2 and I 2 , and publication bias using funnel plotting and Egger’s regression. The protocol for this systematic review is registered at the PROSPERO database (CRD42021247902). Results: Thirteen RCTs met our eligibility criteria and were included in our analysis (2663 patients). We found that hydroxychloroquine—no study on chloroquine was found—reduced the risk of thromboembolic events by 49% (RR 0.51[IC 95% 0.31–0.84]) with a medium heterogeneity (I 2 = 67% and T 2 = 0.4948). We did find some asymmetry in the inspection of the funnel plot, which was ruled out through an Egger’s regression ( p-value = 0.1025). Conclusion: Our data reinforce the idea that hydroxychloroquine reduces the risk of thromboembolic events.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/09612033221074192

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Knisely MH, 1941, J Am Med Assoc, 116, 2430
  2. Higgins J, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barros Edington, F. L., de Rezende, D. F., dos Santos, L. F. S., Garcia, R. V., Gadelha, S. R., & Santiago, M. B.
Affiliations
  • Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública, Salvador, Brazil
  • Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brazil
  • Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz (BR)
  • Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (BR)
Venue
Lupus
Published
2022-01-18
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
238-245
ISSN
  • 0961-2033 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0962
OpenAlex
W4220742556
Cited by
7
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lupus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
Keywords
hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, thromboembolic events, venous thromboembolism, thromboprophylaxis
MeSH terms
Chloroquine, Humans, Hydroxychloroquine, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review