Cited by 978Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchMalaria Research and Control

Clinical efficacy and side effects of antimalarials in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review

Ruiz-Irastorza, G, Ramos-Casals, M, Brito-Zeron, P, Khamashta, M A·2010·Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Abstract

Background Antimalarial drugs (AMs), chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), are frequently withdrawn in patients with lupus with either severe or remitting disease. However, additional effects beyond immunomodulation have been recently described. The aim of the present work was to analyse all the published evidence of the beneficial and adverse effects of AM therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Methods A systematic review of the English literature between 1982 and 2007 was conducted using the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were selected. Case reports were excluded except for toxicity reports. The GRADE system was used to analyse the quality of the evidence.Results A total of 95 articles were included in the systematic review. High levels of evidence were found that AMs prevent lupus flares and increase long-term survival of patients with SLE; moderate evidence of protection against irreversible organ damage, thrombosis and bone mass loss. Toxicity related to AMs is infrequent, mild and usually reversible, with HCQ having a safer profile. In pregnant women, high levels of evidence were found that AMs, particularly HCQ, decrease lupus activity without harming the baby. By contrast, evidence supporting an effect on severe lupus activity, lipid levels and subclinical atherosclerosis was weak. Individual papers suggest effects in preventing the evolution from SLE-like to full-blown SLE, influencing vitamin D levels and protecting patients with lupus against cancer.Conclusions Given the broad spectrum of beneficial effects and the safety profile, HCQ should be given to most patients with SLE during the whole course of the disease, irrespective of its severity, and be continued during pregnancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/ard.2008.101766

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruiz-Irastorza, G., Ramos-Casals, M., Brito-Zeron, P., & Khamashta, M. A.
Affiliations
St Thomas' Hospital (GB)
Venue
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
20-28
ISSN
0003-4967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004135257
Cited by
978
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 123 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 52 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 59
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
Keywords
systemic lupus erythematosus, antimalarial drugs, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, monoclonal antibodies, scFv, pre-trained language models, convolutional neural networks
MeSH terms
Antimalarials, Humans, Lipids, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Osteoporosis, Research Design, Thrombosis, Bone Density, Survival Analysis, Evidence-Based Medicine, Atherosclerosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review