Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,654

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data

Seaman, Shaun R, White, Ian R·2013·Statistical Methods in Medical Research

Abstract

The simplest approach to dealing with missing data is to restrict the analysis to complete cases, i.e. individuals with no missing values. This can induce bias, however. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) is a commonly used method to correct this bias. It is also used to adjust for unequal sampling fractions in sample surveys. This article is a review of the use of IPW in epidemiological research. We describe how the bias in the complete-case analysis arises and how IPW can remove it. IPW is compared with multiple imputation (MI) and we explain why, despite MI generally being more efficient, IPW may sometimes be preferred. We discuss the choice of missingness model and methods such as weight truncation, weight stabilisation and augmented IPW. The use of IPW is illustrated on data from the 1958 British Birth Cohort.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0962280210395740

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. 10.1007/s00127-005-0882-5 · DOI
  2. 10.2307/1403631 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1177/096228029600500303 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1027/1614-2241/a000005 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/aje/kwi320 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s10654-006-9008-y · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.014 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/sim.3482 · DOI
  9. 10.1001/archpsyc.64.6.668 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1002/sim.1821 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.10.006 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1136/oem.2003.007294 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00399.x · DOI
  14. 10.1093/aje/kwi271 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.01.017 · DOI
  16. 10.1192/bjp.185.4.306 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/bimj.200310049 · DOI
  18. 10.1136/oem.2007.036640 · DOI
  19. Stansfeld SA, 2008, Drug Alcohol Depend, 95, 269, 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.014 · DOI
  20. 10.1186/1471-2288-7-51 · DOI
  21. 10.1198/000313002753631330 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970115)16:1<39::AID-SIM535>3.0.CO;2-D · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19970115)16:1<39::aid-sim535>3.0.co;2-d
  23. 10.1016/j.csda.2007.04.020 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00407.x · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1214/07-STS227D · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1198/000313007X172556 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1177/0962280206075304 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2009.01215.x · DOI · Paper page
  29. Goldstein H, 2009, Longit Life Course Stud, 1, 63
  30. 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2006.00546.x · DOI
  31. Seaman SR, Combining multiple imputation and inverse-probability weighting
  32. Tsiatis AA. Semiparametric theory and missing data, New York: Springer, 2006, pp. 206–207.
  33. Kalton G, 2003, J Off Stat, 19, 81
  34. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.011 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1093/aje/kwj149 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1214/07-STS227 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Hosmer DW, 1989, Applied logistic regression
  38. 10.1093/biomet/72.3.487 · DOI
  39. 10.1080/01621459.1997.10474004 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/0470090456.ch21 · DOI
  41. 10.1214/07-STS227C · DOI
  42. Folsom RE, 1991, Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Social Statistics Section, 197
  43. 10.1093/biomet/asp033 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1016/j.csda.2004.08.013 · DOI
  45. 10.1093/aje/kwi208 · DOI
  46. 10.1093/aje/kwn164 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/j.jspi.2008.10.024 · doi:10.1016/j.jspi.2008.10.024
  48. 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00377.x · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.2337/dc06-1881 · DOI
  51. 10.1136/jech.2006.058966 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1080/01621459.1995.10476493 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1080/01621459.1998.10473795 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1191/0962280204sm351ra · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1093/biomet/87.1.113 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970115)16:1<5::AID-SIM469>3.0.CO;2-8 · DOI
  57. 10.1080/01621459.1997.10473653 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,654

Metadata

Authors
Seaman, S. R., & White, I. R.
Venue
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Published
2011-01-10
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
278-295
ISSN
  • 0962-2802 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0334
OpenAlex
W1968185435
Cited by
1,654
References
6
FWCI
19.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0962280210395740
The paper
Seaman, S. R., & White, I. R. (2013). Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280210395740

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.