The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Handling missing data in survey research
Abstract
Missing data occur in survey research because an element in the target population is not included on the survey's sampling frame (noncoverage), because a sampled element does not participate in the survey (total nonresponse) and because a responding sampled element fails to provide acceptable responses to one or more of the survey items (item nonresponse). A variety of methods have been developed to attempt to compensate for missing survey data in a general purpose way that enables the survey's data file to be analysed without regard for the missing data. Weighting adjustments are often used to compensate for noncoverage and total nonresponse. Imputation methods that assign values for missing responses are used to compensate for item nonresponses. This paper describes the various weighting and imputation methods that have been developed, and discusses their benefits and limitations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
Rubin, D. B. (1987) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9780470316696 · Cited by 20,701
Classification And Regression Trees
Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (2017) · doi:10.1201/9781315139470 · Cited by 11,417
Multiple imputation after 18+ years
Rubin, D. B. (1996) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1996.10476908 · Cited by 4,072
An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data
Kass, G. V. (1980) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2986296 · Cited by 2,880
Calibration Estimators in Survey Sampling
Deville, J.-C., & Särndal, C.-E. (1992) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1992.10475217 · Cited by 1,735
Deming, W. E., & Stephan, F. F. (1940) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177731829 · Cited by 1,537
Cited by
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-2699 · Cited by 2,593
Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce
Stewart, W. F. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.18.2443 · Cited by 1,570
Cost of Lost Productive Work Time Among US Workers With Depression
Stewart, W. F. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.23.3135 · Cited by 1,421
Response Rates and Responsiveness for Surveys, Standards, and the Journal
Fincham, J. E. (2008) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/aj720243 · Cited by 1,294
A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non‐response
Andridge, R. R., & Little, R. J. A. (2010) · International Statistical Review · doi:10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00103.x · Cited by 1,077
Metadata
- Authors
- Brick, J., & Kalton, G.
- Venue
- Statistical Methods in Medical Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 215-238
- ISSN
- 0962-2802 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0334
- OpenAlex
- W1981987056
- Cited by
- 535
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 19.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Handling missing data in survey research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/096228029600500302
- The paper
- Brick, J., & Kalton, G. (1996). Handling missing data in survey research. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029600500302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.