The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Response Rates and Responsiveness for Surveys, Standards, and the Journal
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-0417 · Cited by 4,215
A Meta-Analysis of Response Rates in Web- or Internet-Based Surveys
Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. L. (2000) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/00131640021970934 · Cited by 2,396
A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates
Kaplowitz, M. D., Hadlock, T. D., & Levine, R. (2004) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfh006 · Cited by 1,661
Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method
Randall, A., Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R. T. (1990) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146688 · Cited by 1,549
E-mail Survey Response Rates: A Review
Sheehan, K. B. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00117.x · Cited by 1,441
Development of a Standard E-Mail Methodology: Results of an Experiment
Schaefer, D. R., & Dillman, D. A. (1998) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/297851 · Cited by 830
Handling missing data in survey research
Brick, J., & Kalton, G. (1996) · Statistical Methods in Medical Research · doi:10.1177/096228029600500302 · Cited by 535
Comparative Response to a Survey Executed by Post, E-mail, & Web Form
Yun, G. W., & Trumbo, C. W. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00112.x · Cited by 464
Best Practices for Survey Research Reports: A Synopsis for Authors and Reviewers
Draugalis, J. R., Coons, S. J., & Plaza, C. M. (2008) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/aj720111 · Cited by 434
Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies
Sitzia, J., & Wood, N. (1998) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/10.4.311 · Cited by 377
Cited by
Batty, G. D., Gale, C. R., Kivimäki, M., Deary, I. J., & Bell, S. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m131 · Cited by 635
Reporting Guidelines for Survey Research: An Analysis of Published Guidance and Reporting Practices
Bennett, C., Khangura, S., Brehaut, J. C., Graham, I. D., Moher, D., Potter, B. K., & M. Grimshaw, J. (2011) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001069 · Cited by 397
Sigfrid, L., Drake, T. M., Pauley, E., Jesudason, E. C., Olliaro, P., Lim, W. S., Gillesen, A., Berry, C., Lowe, D. J., McPeake, J., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100186 · Cited by 336
Critical Management Practices Influencing On-Site Waste Minimization in Construction Projects
Ajayi, S. O., Oyedele, L. O., Bilal, M., Akinade, O. O., Alaka, H. A., & Owolabi, H. A. (2017) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.040 · Cited by 200
Understanding Older People’s Readiness for Receiving Telehealth: Mixed-Method Study
(2018) · doi:10.2196/jmir.8407 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Fincham, J. E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 43
- ISSN
- 0002-9459 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116246239
- Cited by
- 1,294
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 22.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response Rates and Responsiveness for Surveys, Standards, and the Journal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5688/aj720243
- The paper
- Fincham, J. E. (2008). Response Rates and Responsiveness for Surveys, Standards, and the Journal. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj720243
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
