The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Origin of Cultural Differences in Cognition: The Social Orientation Hypothesis
Open accessAbstract
A large body of research documents cognitive differences between Westerners and East Asians. Westerners tend to be more analytic and East Asians tend to be more holistic. These findings have often been explained as being due to corresponding differences in social orientation. Westerners are more independent and Easterners are more interdependent. However, comparisons of the cognitive tendencies of Westerners and East Asians do not allow us to rule out alternative explanations for the cognitive differences, such as linguistic and genetic differences, as well as cultural differences other than social orientation. In this review we summarize recent developments that provide stronger support for the social orientation hypothesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For instance, people living in societies that emphasize interdependence in social coordination (such as Japan) tend to reflect on the mental states of others more, define the self through relationships with others, and are better able to avoid underweighting contextual information, relative to people living in more independent contexts (such as the USA) 92,93 .”
From Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“More generally, societies that emphasize interdependence rather than independence are more likely to promote relational goals, pay attention to social cues, define the self as embedded within one's social environment and display social context vigilance 92-95 .”
From Predictors and consequences of intellectual humility (2022) · cites this paper as [93]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995 · cited 3×
“Independently oriented cultures tend to view the self as bounded and separate from social others, whereas interdependently oriented cultures tend to view the self as interconnected and as encompassing important relationships (e.g. Markus & Kitayama, 1991; Triandis, 1989).”
BackgroundSelf-citationJournal of personality and social psychology
Armstrong, J. (1988) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(88)90126-4 · Cited by 10,544
Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3 · Cited by 5,758
Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition.
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.291 · Cited by 4,263
Self-citationThe geography of thought : how Asians and Westerners think differently--and why
Nisbett, R. E. (2003) · Cited by 1,983
Self-citationDoes culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism.
Oyserman, D., & Lee, S. W. S. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.311 · Cited by 1,390 · cited 3×
“A recent meta-analysis by Oyserman and Lee (2008) finds that a variety of primes of social orientation can produce corresponding shifts in cognition (meta-analysis is a statistical technique in which the results of many studies with similar hypotheses are combined).”
BackgroundInfluentialTönnies, F. (1963) · Cited by 1,198
(1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,084
Kitayama, S., Mesquita, B., & Karasawa, M. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.890 · Cited by 925
Self-citationKitayama, S., Park, H., Sevincer, A. T., Karasawa, M., & Uskul, A. K. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0015999 · Cited by 639
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Kraus M.W., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Medzheritskaya J., 2008, Paper presented at the 19th International Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology
- Naumov A.I., 1996, Management, 1, 70
- Oishi S., Perspectives on Psychological Science
- Šverko B.B., 1995, Life roles, values and careers, 225
- Triandis H.C., 1989, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 37. Cross-cultural perspectives, 41
- Witkin H.A., 1975, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The weirdest people in the world?
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0999152x · Cited by 12,641
Large-Scale Psychological Differences Within China Explained by Rice Versus Wheat Agriculture
Talhelm, T., Zhang, X., Oishi, S., Shimin, C., Duan, D., Lan, X., & Kitayama, S. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246850 · Cited by 1,374
Self-citationCulture, Mind, and the Brain: Current Evidence and Future Directions
Kitayama, S., & Üskül, A. K. (2010) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145357 · Cited by 751
Self-citationGlobal Increases in Individualism
Santos, H. C., Varnum, M. E. W., & Grossmann, I. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617700622 · Cited by 665
Self-citationThe Church, intensive kinship, and global psychological variation
Schulz, J., Bahrami‐Rad, D., Beauchamp, J. P., & Henrich, J. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aau5141 · Cited by 540
Metadata
- Authors
- Varnum, M. E. W., Grossmann, I., Kitayama, S., & Nisbett, R. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Varnum, Michael E. W.
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-13
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- PMC
- PMC2838233
- OpenAlex
- W2119537973
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 32.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG029509)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- cultural differences in cognition, social orientation, individualism-collectivism, cross-cultural cognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
