Cited by 120Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAction Observation and Synchronization

Bio-behavioral synchrony promotes the development of conceptualized emotions

Open access
Atzil, Shir, Gendron, Maria·2017·Current Opinion in Psychology

Abstract

As adults, we have structured conceptual representations of our emotions that help us to make sense of and regulate our ongoing affective experience. The ability to use emotion concepts is critical to make predictions about the world and choose appropriate action, such as ‘I am afraid, and going to run away’ or ‘I am hungry and going to eat’. Thus, emotion concepts have an important role in helping us maintain our ongoing physiological balance, or allostasis. We will suggest here that infants can learn emotion concepts for the purpose of allostasis regulation, and that conceptualization is key component in emotional development. Moreover, we will suggest that social dyads facilitate concept learning because of a robust evolutionary feature seen in newborns of social species: they cannot survive alone and depend on conspecifics for allostasis regulation. Such social dependency creates a robust driving force for social learning of emotion concepts, and makes the social dyad, which is designed to regulate the infant’s allostasis, an optimal medium for concept learning. In line with that, we will review evidence showing that the neural reference space for emotion overlaps with neural circuits that support allostasis (striatum, amygdala, hypothalamus) and conceptualization (medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex), and that their developmental trajectories are interrelated, and depend on synchronous social care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.009

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Atzil, S., & Gendron, M.
Affiliations
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
  • Northeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Atzil, Shir
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
17
Pages
162-169
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2734721194
Cited by
120
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD076164)
  • National Institute of Mental Health NRSA fellowship (5F32MH105052)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
emotion concepts, conceptualization of emotions, allostasis, infant emotional development, social learning, social synchrony, striatum, amygdala, hypothalamus, medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, emotion regulation, social care
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Concept Formation, Emotions, Humans, Models, Biological, Models, Psychological, Neural Pathways, Emotional Intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review