The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genetic and Environmental Influences on Cognition Across Development and Context
Open accessAbstract
Genes account for between approximately 50% and 70% of the variation in cognition at the population level. However, population-level estimates of heritability potentially mask marked subgroup differences. We review the body of empirical evidence indicating that (a) genetic influences on cognition increase from infancy to adulthood, and (b) genetic influences on cognition are maximized in more advantaged socioeconomic contexts (i.e., a Gene × Socioeconomic Status interaction). We discuss potential mechanisms underlying these effects, particularly transactional models of cognitive development. Transactional models predict that people in high-opportunity contexts actively evoke and select positive learning experiences on the basis of their genetic predispositions; these learning experiences, in turn, reciprocally influence cognition. The net result of this transactional process is increasing genetic influence with increasing age and increasing environmental opportunity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Genetic differences are probabilistically associated with psychiatric, medical, and social outcomes, in part via environmental mechanisms that might differ across historical, political, and economic contexts61.”
From Multivariate analysis of 1.5 million people identifies genetic associations with traits related to self-regulation and addiction. (2021) · cites this paper as [61]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Indeed, both phenomena may reflect a process of increased and accumulated effects of gene-environment transactions with the increased opportunity that comes with both social class and age (Tucker-Drob et al., 2013; Turkheimer & Horn, 2014).”
From Large Cross-National Differences in Gene × Socioeconomic Status Interaction on Intelligence (2016) · cites this paper as Tucker-Drob et al., 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.568 · Cited by 2,973
How People Make Their Own Environments: A Theory of Genotype Environment Effects
Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1983.tb03884.x · Cited by 2,895
International data on educational attainment: updates and implications
Barro, R. J. (2001) · Oxford Economic Papers · doi:10.1093/oep/53.3.541 · Cited by 2,604
Whither opportunity?: rising inequality, schools, and children's life chances
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-5804 · Cited by 1,745
Genotype-environment interaction and correlation in the analysis of human behavior.
Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., & Loehlin, J. C. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.2.309 · Cited by 1,685
International Data on Educational Attainment Updates and Implications
Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. (2000) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w7911 · Cited by 1,601
Socioeconomic Status Modifies Heritability of IQ in Young Children
Turkheimer, E., Haley, A., Waldron, M., D'Onofrio, B., & Gottesman, I. I. (2003) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1475.x · Cited by 1,373
Marsh, H. W., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2005) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00853.x · Cited by 1,198
Intelligence: New findings and theoretical developments
Nisbett, R. E., Aronson, J., Blair, C., Dickens, W., Flynn, J., Halpern, D. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2012) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0026699 · Cited by 1,031
Locurto, C. (2024) · SpringerBriefs in psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-69402-8 · Cited by 935
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Briley D. A., Psychological Science
- Scarr S., 1983, Child Development, 54, 424
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–303 of 303
Kvalvik, E. H., Wang, Y., Walhovd, K. B., Lyngstad, T. H., & Røgeberg, O. J. (2026) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1012310 · Cited by 2
Cadby, G., Badcock, J. C., Hincks, S., & McCarthy, N. S. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-11055560/v1
Gignac, G. E. (2026) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2026.102073
Metadata
- Authors
- Tucker-Drob, E. M., Briley, D. A., & Harden, K. P.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychology and Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-09-25
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 349-355
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- PMC
- PMC4006996
- OpenAlex
- W2135600715
- Semantic Scholar
- 2dc1d7f0835ff2109e7e24c76ea0129d5c266c0c
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 18.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD042849, R21HD069772, T32HD007081)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- environmental influences on cognition, socioeconomic status, learning opportunities, genetic susceptibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review