Cited by 2,973Cognitive Abilities and TestingPsychology of Development and EducationAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Nature-nurture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model.

Bronfenbrenner, Urie, Ceci, Stephen J.·1994·Psychological Review

Abstract

In response to Anastasi's (1958) long-standing challenge, the authors propose an empirically testable theoretical model that (a) goes beyond and qualifies the established behavioral genetics paradigm by allowing for nonadditive synergistic effects, direct measures of the environment, and mechanisms of organism-environment interaction, called proximal processes, through which genotypes are transformed into phenotypes; (b) hypothesizes that estimates of heritability (e.g., h2) increase markedly with the magnitude of proximal processes; (c) demonstrates that heritability measures the proportion of variation in individual differences attributable only to actualized genetic potential, with the degree of nonactualized potential remaining unknown; (d) proposes that, by enhancing proximal processes and environments, it is possible to increase the extent of actualized genetic potentials for developmental competence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.568

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The transition to fatherhood is a major developmental milestone for men.

    “The transition to fatherhood is a major developmental milestone for men.”

    From Birth of a Father: Fathering in the First 1,000 Days (2019) · cites this paper as Bronfenbrenner & Ceci, 1994

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
1994-10
Volume
101
Issue
4
Pages
568-586
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2075631829
Cited by
2,973
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 146 · 2025: 191 · 2024: 185 · 2023: 211 · 2022: 192 · 2021: 168 · 2020: 170 · 2019: 121 · 2018: 130 · 2017: 123 · 2016: 122 · 2015: 131 · 2014: 113 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 116
FWCI
17.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
nature-nurture interaction, bioecological model, proximal processes, organism-environment interaction, heritability, behavioral genetics, gene-environment interaction, non-additive genetic effects, individual differences, developmental competence
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Female, Genotype, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Models, Psychological, Phenotype, Social Environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review