The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Getting a Grip on Cognitive Flexibility
Open accessAbstract
Cognitive flexibility refers to the ability to quickly reconfigure our mind, as when we switch between different tasks. This review highlights recent evidence showing that cognitive flexibility can be conditioned by simple incentives typically known to drive lower-level learning, such as stimulus–response associations. Cognitive flexibility can also become associated with, and triggered by, bottom-up contextual cues in our environment, including subliminal cues. Therefore, we suggest that the control functions that mediate cognitive flexibility are grounded in, and guided by, basic associative-learning mechanisms and abide by the same learning principles as more low-level forms of behavior. Such a learning perspective on cognitive flexibility offers new directions and important implications for further research, theory, and applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.1998.712192 · Cited by 27,225
Diamond, A. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750 · Cited by 13,268
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 · Cited by 7,351
Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986) · Consciousness and Self-Regulation · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0629-1_1 · Cited by 4,455
Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks.
Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207 · Cited by 3,170 · cited 1×
“The switch cost has been interpreted as an index of cognitive-control processes required for reconfiguring the task set (Rogers & Monsell, 1995) or resolving interference from the previously active task set (Allport, Styles, & Hsieh, 1994).”
MethodControl and interference in task switching—A review
Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0019842 · Cited by 1,485
Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in the Digital era
Eshet‐Alkalai, Y. (2004) · Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia · Cited by 1,326
Do “brain-training” programs work?
Simons, D. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S. E., Chabris, C. F., Hambrick, D. Z., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2016) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100616661983 · Cited by 1,183
De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.853 · Cited by 1,181
Cited by
Cortés Pascual, A., Moyano Muñoz, N., & Quílez Robres, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01582 · Cited by 540
Metadata
- Authors
- Braem, S., & Egner, T.
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-10-16
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 470-476
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- OpenAlex
- W2803343405
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 7.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Getting a Grip on Cognitive Flexibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0963721418787475
- The paper
- Braem, S., & Egner, T. (2018). Getting a Grip on Cognitive Flexibility. Current Directions in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418787475
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
