Cited by 81Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAttachment and Relationship DynamicsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Vitamin S: why is social contact, even with strangers, so important to well-being?

Open access
Van Lange, Paul A. M., Columbus, Simon·2021·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Even before COVID-19, it was well known in psychological science that people’s well-being is strongly served by the quality of their close relationships. But is well-being also served by social contact with people who are known less well? In this article, we discuss three propositions that support the conclusion that the benefits of social contact also derive from interactions with acquaintances and even strangers. The propositions state that most interaction situations with strangers are benign (Proposition 1), that most strangers are benign (Proposition 2), and that most interactions with strangers enhance well-being (Proposition 3). These propositions are supported, first, by recent research designed to illuminate the primary features of interaction situations. This research shows that situations with strangers often represent low conflict of interest. Also, in interactions with strangers, most people exhibit high levels of low-cost cooperation (social mindfulness) and, if the need is urgent, high levels of high-cost helping. We close by sharing research examples showing that even very subtle interactions with strangers yield short-term happiness. Broader implications for COVID-19 and urbanization are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/09637214211002538

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI-based chatbots could be useful to add social experiences for some individuals, particularly those facing difficulties developing relationships on their own.

    “At the same time, AI-based chatbots could be useful to add social experiences for some individuals (while not completely replacing human-to-human interaction), particularly for those facing difficulties developing relationships on their own (who need “Vitamin S,” from Social contact; (132), but are likely to be a poor or even dangerous replacement for human interaction writ large.”
  • AI-based chatbots are likely a poor or even dangerous replacement for human interaction writ large.

    “At the same time, AI-based chatbots could be useful to add social experiences for some individuals (while not completely replacing human-to-human interaction), particularly for those facing difficulties developing relationships on their own (who need “Vitamin S,” from Social contact; (132), but are likely to be a poor or even dangerous replacement for human interaction writ large.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Lange, P. A. M., & Columbus, S.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Brain and Behavior Amsterdam (IBBA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2021-05-27
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
267-273
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W3161700653
Cited by
81
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5
FWCI
12.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
social contact, strangers, well-being, happiness, close relationships, social mindfulness, helping behavior, conflicts of interest, urbanization, COVID-19 pandemic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review