Cited by 243Personality Traits and PsychologySocial and Intergroup PsychologyEmotions and Moral Behavior

Social mindfulness: skill and will to navigate the social world.

Van Doesum, Niels J., Van Lange, Dion A. W., Van Lange, Paul A. M.·2013·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Although one may not always see it, social life often involves choices that make people act in ways that are mindful of others or not. We adopt an interdependence theoretical approach to the novel concept of social mindfulness, which we conceptualize in terms of other-regarding choices involving both skill (to see it, e.g., theory of mind, perspective taking) and will (to do it, e.g., empathic concern, prosocial orientation) to act mindfully toward another person's control over outcomes. We operationalized social mindfulness in a new social decision-making paradigm that focuses on leaving or limiting choice options for others that we tested across 7 studies. Studies 1a through 1c showed that people with other-oriented mindsets left interdependent others more choice than people with self-oriented and/or unspecified mindsets. Studies 2a and 2b revealed that people developed more favorable judgments of a socially mindful than of a socially unmindful person. Study 3 revealed that unknown others with trustworthy (vs. untrustworthy) faces were met with more social mindfulness. Study 4 revealed that social mindfulness could be traced in personality by being positively related to Honesty-Humility and Agreeableness (HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised) as well as to Empathy (Interpersonal Reactivity Index) and a prosocial value orientation (SVO). Together, these studies contribute to explaining how social mindfulness can help people to navigate the social world by aiming to maximize other people's control over their situational outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0032540

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Established social cognitive and mindfulness theories assert that mindfulness fosters emotional connection to others, mental state attribution, and prosocial behavior.

    “Findings from the present study are in line with established social cognitive and mindfulness theories, which assert that mindfulness fosters emotional connection to others, mental state attribution, and prosocial behavior (Hutcherson et al., 2008; Birnie et al., 2010; Van Doesum et al., 2013; Tan et al., 2014; Lim et al., 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Doesum, N. J., Van Lange, D. A. W., & Van Lange, P. A. M.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2013
Volume
105
Issue
1
Pages
86-103
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2168510599
Cited by
241
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2
FWCI
12.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (022.003.040)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
social mindfulness, interdependence theory, theory of mind, perspective taking, empathic concern, prosocial orientation, social decision-making, HEXACO personality, honesty-humility, agreeableness, Interpersonal Reactivity Index, trust
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Choice Behavior, Concept Formation, Decision Making, Empathy, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Personality, Social Behavior, United States, Young Adult, Theory of Mind, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review