The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning for a Change: Exploring the Relationship Between Education and Sustainable Development
Abstract
Whether we view sustainable development as our greatest challenge or a subversive litany, every phase of education is now being urged to declare its support for education for sustainable development (ESD). In this paper, we explore the ideas behind ESD and, building on work by Foster and by Scott and Gough, we argue that it is necessary now to think of two complementary approaches: ESD 1 and ESD 2. We see ESD 1 as the promotion of informed, skilled behaviours and ways of thinking, useful in the short-term where the need is clearly identified and agreed, and ESD 2 as building capacity to think critically about what experts say and to test ideas, exploring the dilemmas and contradictions inherent in sustainable living. We note the prevalence of ESD 1 approaches, especially from policy makers; this is a concern because people rarely change their behaviour in response to a rational call to do so, and more importantly, too much successful ESD 1 in isolation would reduce our capacity to manage change ourselves and therefore make us less sustainable. We argue that ESD 2 is a necessary complement to ESD 1, making it meaningful in a learning sense. In this way we avoid an either-or debate in favour of a yes-and approach that constantly challenges us to understand what we are communicating, how we are going about it and, crucially, why we are doing it in the first place.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Cited by
The Concept of Sustainable Development: From its Beginning to the Contemporary Issues
Klarin, T. (2018) · Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business · doi:10.2478/zireb-2018-0005 · Cited by 836
Barth, M., & Rieckmann, M. (2012) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.011 · Cited by 441
Kajzer Mitchell, I., & Walinga, J. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.162 · Cited by 164
Percy-Smith, B., & Burns, D. (2013) · Local Environment · doi:10.1080/13549839.2012.729565 · Cited by 127
Taking stock of environmental education policy in England—The what, the where and the why
Glackin, M., & King, H. (2020) · Environmental Education Research · doi:10.1080/13504622.2019.1707513 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Vare, P., & Scott, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Education for Sustainable Development
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 191-198
- ISSN
- 0973-4074 (ISSN-L)
- 0973-4082
- OpenAlex
- W2143193114
- Cited by
- 713
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning for a Change: Exploring the Relationship Between Education and Sustainable Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/097340820700100209
- The paper
- Vare, P., & Scott, W. (2007). Learning for a Change: Exploring the Relationship Between Education and Sustainable Development. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/097340820700100209
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.