Cited by 4Gender Studies and Social IssuesGender, Education, and Development IssuesGender Politics and Representation

Are organizations accountable? Disconnect between gender and sanitation in Bangladesh.

Open access
Mannan, Fouzia·2018·Environment and Urbanization Asia

Abstract

Deep-rooted gender inequalities exist in organizations responsible for provisioning sanitation facilities in Bangladesh with regard to organizational culture, financial status and power axis within and beyond the organizations. There are huge gaps between these organizations as these have differential gender-sensitive policies or even lack proper understanding of gender. Without having a gender-sensitive leadership within organizations, sanitation issues continue to have a male-dominated bias. Given the patriarchal organizational culture and mindset in Bangladesh, serious rethinking is needed to bring about a gender-sensitive sanitation policy. This article aims to investigate gender issues in sanitation through qualitative analysis of select sanitation and water-implementing organizations in Dhaka and explore how they understand, interpret and practice ‘gender’.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0975425317748534

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Mannan, F. (2002). Gender and development: An analysis of selected NGO interventions in Bangladesh and India (Unpublished PhD thesis). Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
  2. Mills, A.J., & Tancred, P. (Eds). (1992). Gendering organisational analysis. Newbery Park, CA: SAGE.
  3. Yasmin, T. (1997). What is different about women's organizations? In A. M. Goetz (Ed.), Getting institution rights for women in development. London, UK: Zed Books Ltd.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mannan, F.
Affiliations
East West University (BD)
Corresponding author
Mannan, Fouzia
Venue
Environment and Urbanization Asia
Published
2018-01-15
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
101-106
ISSN
  • 0975-4253 (ISSN-L)
  • 0976-3546
OpenAlex
W2783978200
Cited by
4
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Environment and Urbanization Asia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Education › Gender, Education, and Development Issues
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
Keywords
gender inequality, sanitation, organizational accountability, gender-sensitive policy, water management, Dhaka

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review