Cited by 63COVID-19 and Mental HealthInfluenza Virus Research StudiesRisk Perception and Management

Preventive Behaviors and Mental Distress in Response to H1N1 among University Students in Guangzhou, China

Open access
Gu, Jing, Zhong, Ying, Hao, Yuantao, Zhou, Daming, Tsui, Hiyi, Hao, Chun, Gao, Qi, Ling, Wenhua +1 more·2015·Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the level of and factors involved in influenza virus subtype H1N1 (H1N1)-related preventive behaviors and mental distress among university students in Guangzhou. PARTICIPANTS: Self-administered questionnaires were used to collect data for 825 students from 2 universities. RESULTS: A total of 49.7% of the participants held misconception(s) concerning H1N1 transmission. Less than 30% washed their hands >10 times/d; 72.3% did not reduce the frequency of touching their mouths, noses, and eyes; only 9.3% would wear face masks if they had influenza-like symptoms. However, 45% worried that one/one's family would contract H1N1, 10.7% were panicking/feeling depressed/feeling emotionally disturbed as a result of H1N1, and 14.9% were fearful about the WHO's H1N1 pandemic announcement. Almost all cognitive variables of this study were significantly associated with mental distress caused by fear of H1N1 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.29-3.81), but very few were associated with adoption of preventive measures (OR = 0.65-1.90). CONCLUSIONS: Preventive measures are warranted to alleviate distress in the population studied via health education and promotion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1010539512443699

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gu, J., Zhong, Y., Hao, Y., Zhou, D., Tsui, H., Hao, C., Gao, Q., Ling, W., & Lau, J. T. F.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • South China Agricultural University (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health
Published
2012-04-24
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
NP1867-NP1879
ISSN
  • 1010-5395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2479
OpenAlex
W2320191954
Cited by
63
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Sun Yat-sen University
  • Foundation for Distinguished Young Talents in Higher Education of Guangdong
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Keywords
H1N1 influenza, pandemic influenza, preventive behavior, psychological distress, university students, health misconceptions, hand washing, face masks, fear of infection, psychological impact of pandemic, health education
MeSH terms
Adult, China, Communicable Disease Control, Female, Hand Disinfection, Humans, Influenza, Human, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Stress, Psychological, Students, Universities, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review