Cited by 50Psychometric Methodologies and TestingDiverse Music Education InsightsStudent Assessment and Feedback

Rater fairness in music performance assessment: evaluating model-data fit and differential rater functioning

Wesolowski, Brian C., Wind, Stefanie A., Engelhard, George·2015·Musicae Scientiae

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate model-data fit and differential rater functioning in the context of large group music performance assessment using the Many-Facet Rasch Partial Credit Measurement Model. In particular, we sought to identify whether or not expert raters’ ( N = 24) severity was invariant across four school levels (middle school, high school, collegiate, professional). Interaction analyses suggested that differential rater functioning existed for both the group of raters and some individual raters based on their expected locations on the logit scale. This indicates that expert raters did not demonstrate invariant levels of severity when rating subgroups of ensembles across the four school levels. Of the 92 potential pairwise interactions examined, 14 (15.2%) interactions were found to be statistically significant, indicating that 10 individual raters demonstrated differential severity across at least one school level. Interpretations of meaningful systematic patterns emerged for some raters after investigating individual pairwise interactions. Implications for improving the fairness and equity in large group music performance evaluations are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1029864915589014

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wesolowski, B. C., Wind, S. A., & Engelhard, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
Venue
Musicae Scientiae
Published
2015-05-22
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
147-170
ISSN
  • 1029-8649 (ISSN-L)
  • 2045-4147
OpenAlex
W2342276252
Cited by
50
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Musicae Scientiae (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
music performance assessment, rater severity, model-data fit, school level differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review