Cited by 42Social Media in Health EducationHealth, Medicine and SocietyImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Psychiatry and online social media: potential, pitfalls and ethical guidelines for psychiatrists and trainees

Frankish, Katherine, Ryan, Christopher, Harris, Anthony·2012·Australasian Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: This paper proposes ethical guidelines for psychiatrists and psychiatry trainees when interacting with social media. Methods: A three-stage process was followed in the development of these guidelines. A literature review provided situations and possible broad rules as to how social media could be ethically engaged. A roundtable discussion by a panel of invited psychiatrists, psychiatry trainees, psychologists, e-health practitioners, lawyers and consumers was held to discuss the situations and to better formulate the ethical principles upon which psychiatrists could act. These vignettes and principles were then broadly discussed at a seminar held at the 2011 RANZCP Congress. Finally, this paper was circulated to the original invitees for final comment. Results: A set of recommendations for working with social media were developed. Conclusions: The new social media provides important avenues for communication, education and treatment. These avenues pose ethical and practical dilemmas that can be resolved by the application of established ethical principles. Practical recommendations for navigating social media are proposed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1039856212447881

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Doctors' concerns about legal issues and privacy in online communication are comparable to those in other countries and remain unaltered despite guidelines published by professional organizations.

    “These concerns are comparable to those shown in other countries [27] and remain unaltered despite the development of guidelines for social media published by professional organizations before and during the study period [35-39].”

    From How Doctors View and Use Social Media: A National Survey (2014) · cites this paper as [35]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frankish, K., Ryan, C., & Harris, A.
Affiliations
  • Westmead Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
Australasian Psychiatry
Published
2012-06
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
181-187
ISSN
  • 1039-8562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1665
OpenAlex
W2013242952
Cited by
42
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
5.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australasian Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
social media, psychiatry, moral norms, professional ethics, psychiatric trainees, online communication, e-health, ethical principles, professional boundaries
MeSH terms
Confidentiality, Ethics, Medical, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Psychiatry, Guidelines as Topic, Privacy, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review