Cited by 112Social Media in Health EducationHealth, Medicine and SocietyMedical and Health Sciences Research

Social media and the medical profession

Open access
Mansfield, Sarah J, Morrison, Stewart G, Stephens, Hugh O, Bonning, Michael A, Wang, Sheng‐Hui, Withers, Aaron H J, Olver, Rob C, Perry, Andrew W·2011·Medical Journal of Australia

Abstract

Use of social media by doctors and medical students is common and growing. Although professional standards and codes of ethics that govern the behaviour of medical practitioners in Australia and New Zealand do not currently encompass social media, these codes need to evolve, because professional standards continue to apply in this setting. Inappropriate use of social media can result in harm to patients and the profession, including breaches of confidentiality, defamation of colleagues or employers, and violation of doctor-patient boundaries. The professional integrity of doctors and medical students can also be damaged through problematic interprofessional online relationships, and unintended exposure of personal information to the public, employers or universities. Doctors need to exercise extreme care in their use of social media to ensure they maintain professional standards.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03149.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These guidelines differ greatly and provide no official consensus on the definition of professional social media use.

    “However, these guidelines differ greatly and provide no official consensus on the definition of professional social media use.”
  • There is no consensus on what constitutes professionalism in online behavior.

    “Although guidelines exist,1–3 there is no consensus on what constitutes professionalism in online behavior.”
  • Various guidelines have been published to establish professional norms and considerations for healthcare workers when using social media.

    “Various guidelines have been published in an effort to establish professional norms and considerations for healthcare workers when using social media.1–3”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mansfield, S. J., Morrison, S. G., Stephens, H. O., Bonning, M. A., Wang, S., Withers, A. H. J., Olver, R. C., & Perry, A. W.
Affiliations
  • Australian Medical Association, Council of Doctors in Training, Canberra, ACT.
  • Australian Medical Association, Victoria Doctors in Training, Melbourne, VIC.
  • Monash University (AU)
  • New Zealand Medical Students’ Association, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Doctors‐in‐Training Council, New Zealand Medical Association, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Australian Medical Students’ Association, Canberra, ACT.
Corresponding author
Mansfield, Sarah J
Venue
Medical Journal of Australia
Publisher
AMPCo
Published
2011-06
Volume
194
Issue
12
Pages
642-644
ISSN
  • 0025-729X (ISSN-L)
  • 1326-5377
OpenAlex
W2407026835
Cited by
112
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
15.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Medical Journal of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical and Health Sciences Research
Keywords
social media, medical profession, medical ethics, professional standards, code of ethics, confidentiality, physician-patient relationship, defamation, professional integrity, medical students, online professional conduct
MeSH terms
Confidentiality, Ethics, Medical, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Physicians, Students, Medical, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review