Cited by 65Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealth, Medicine and Society

Community treatment orders in Australia: rates and patterns of use

Light, Edwina, Kerridge, Ian, Ryan, Christopher, Robertson, Michael·2012·Australasian Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Community treatment orders (CTOs) allow clinicians to provide unconsented outpatient treatment to people living with mental illness. Though controversial and of uncertain efficacy, CTOs are used throughout Australia and internationally. We sought to determine the prevalence of CTO use in Australian states and territories, and to examine changes in the pattern of use over time. METHOD: Australian state and territory mental health review tribunals and health departments were surveyed for the most recent annual data on the total number of CTOs made and the total number of individual people placed on a CTO. RESULTS: Rates of CTO use range from 30.2 per 100,000 population (in Tasmania) to 98.8 per 100,000 population (in Victoria). Use of CTOs in Australia is high by world standards, appears to be increasing over time, and varies significantly across jurisdictions. CONCLUSIONS: The high (by world standards), increasing and variable use of CTOs in Australia is concerning and raises important implications for mental health policymakers and legislators. Current mental health policy activity, particularly the new National Mental Health Commission, provides a unique opportunity to enhance transparency and accountability if regular and nationally uniform CTO data are collected and publically reported.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1039856212466159

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compulsory treatment for people with severe mental disorders in the community is used in many countries, including Australia, Canada, Israel, New Zealand, the UK, and the USA.

    “Compulsory treatment for people with severe mental disorders in the community is used in many countries, including Australia, Canada, Israel, New Zealand, the UK, and the USA (Kanter 1995; Torrey 1995; Light 2012; Gray 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Light, E., Kerridge, I., Ryan, C., & Robertson, M.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
Australasian Psychiatry
Published
2012-11-06
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
478-482
ISSN
  • 1039-8562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1665
OpenAlex
W2116627402
Cited by
65
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australasian Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
community treatment orders, involuntary outpatient treatment, mental illness, mental health policy, Mental Health Review Tribunal, Australia
MeSH terms
Australia, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Humans, Prevalence, Mandatory Programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review