Cited by 49Digital Mental Health InterventionsLGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A qualitative study of sexual minority young people’s experiences of computerised therapy for depression

Lucassen, Mathijs FG, Hatcher, Simon, Fleming, Theresa M, Stasiak, Karolina, Shepherd, Matthew J, Merry, Sally N·2015·Australasian Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: To describe the experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual or sexual minority youth who used a form of computerised therapy (Rainbow SPARX) for depression. Methods: 25 adolescents (20 with significant depressive symptoms) who had trialled Rainbow SPARX took part in semi-structured interviews. The general inductive approach was used to analyse interview data. Results: Feedback consisted of five main themes: ‘appealing aspects’; ‘applying it to real life’; ‘things to improve’; ‘aspects that did not appeal’; and ‘other themes’. Young people suggested that there should be more sexuality-specific (‘rainbow’) content in the computer program. Seventeen participants thought computerised therapy helped them feel better or less depressed. Conclusions: Consumer perspectives are increasingly being sought and this user input is especially useful for improving services. Our study provides important in-depth feedback on Rainbow SPARX from the perspective of sexual minority youth, and it highlights that computerised therapies can be successfully modified for groups traditionally under-served by mainstream mental health interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1039856215579542

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lucassen, M. F., Hatcher, S., Fleming, T. M., Stasiak, K., Shepherd, M. J., & Merry, S. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Venue
Australasian Psychiatry
Published
2015-04-16
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
268-273
ISSN
  • 1039-8562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1665
OpenAlex
W2033227293
Cited by
49
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australasian Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
sexual minority youth, depression, SPARX, adolescents, user feedback, access to mental health care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Bisexuality, Child, Depression, Female, Homosexuality, Humans, Male, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Patient Satisfaction, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review