Cited by 51Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareMental Health and Patient InvolvementHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints

Shared decision making in mental health: the importance for current clinical practice

Alguera-Lara, Victoria, Dowsey, Michelle M, Ride, Jemimah, Kinder, Skye, Castle, David·2017·Australasian Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives: We reviewed the literature on shared decision making (regarding treatments in psychiatry), with a view to informing our understanding of the decision making process and the barriers that exist in clinical practice. Methods: Narrative review of published English-language articles. Results: After culling, 18 relevant articles were included. Themes identified included models of psychiatric care, benefits for patients, and barriers. There is a paucity of published studies specifically related to antipsychotic medications. Conclusions: Shared decision making is a central part of the recovery paradigm and is of increasing importance in mental health service delivery. The field needs to better understand the basis on which decisions are reached regarding psychiatric treatments. Discrete choice experiments might be useful to inform the development of tools to assist shared decision making in psychiatry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1039856217734711

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alguera-Lara, V., Dowsey, M. M., Ride, J., Kinder, S., & Castle, D.
Affiliations
  • St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Castle, David
Venue
Australasian Psychiatry
Published
2017-10-10
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
578-582
ISSN
  • 1039-8562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1665
OpenAlex
W2760882939
Cited by
51
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australasian Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Keywords
shared decision-making, barriers to shared decision-making, recovery-oriented care, antipsychotic drugs, discrete choice experiment, patient benefit
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Decision Making, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Mental Health Services, Patient Participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review