Cited by 28Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsMental Health and Patient InvolvementPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Participation in medical decision-making across Europe: An international longitudinal multicenter study

Open access
Bär Deucher, A., Hengartner, MP, Kawohl, W., Konrad, J., Puschner, B., Clarke, E., Slade, M., Del Vecchio, V. +7 more·2016·European Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this paper was to examine national differences in the desire to participate in decision-making of people with severe mental illness in six European countries. Methods: The data was taken from a European longitudinal observational study (CEDAR; ISRCTN75841675). A sample of 514 patients with severe mental illness from the study centers in Ulm, Germany, London, England, Naples, Italy, Debrecen, Hungary, Aalborg, Denmark and Zurich, Switzerland were assessed as to desire to participate in medical decision-making. Associations between desire for participation in decision-making and center location were analyzed with generalized estimating equations. Results: We found large cross-national differences in patients’ desire to participate in decision-making, with the center explaining 47.2% of total variance in the desire for participation (P< 0.001). Averaged over time and independent of patient characteristics, London (mean = 2.27), Ulm (mean = 2.13) and Zurich (mean = 2.14) showed significantly higher scores in desire for participation, followed by Aalborg (mean = 1.97), where scores were in turn significantly higher than in Debrecen (mean = 1.56). The lowest scores were reported in Naples (mean = 1.14). Over time, the desire for participation in decision-making increased significantly in Zurich (b= 0.23) and decreased in Naples (b= −0.14). In all other centers, values remained stable. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that patients’ desire for participation in decision-making varies by location. We suggest that more research attention be focused on identifying specific cultural and social factors in each country to further explain observed differences across Europe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.02.001

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with severe mental disorders report a greater desire to be involved in clinical decision-making and a need to have a say in the process of care than individuals receiving assistance for other medical conditions.

    “This has been especially highlighted in the case of patients with severe mental disorders who report a greater desire of being involved in clinical decision-making and a need to have a say in the process of care, as compared to individuals receiving assistance for other medical conditions [8–11].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bär Deucher, A., Hengartner, M., Kawohl, W., Konrad, J., Puschner, B., Clarke, E., Slade, M., Del Vecchio, V., Sampogna, G., Égerházi, A., Süveges, Á., Krogsgaard Bording, M., Munk-Jørgensen, P., Rössler, W., & and the CEDAR study group
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Debrecen (HU)
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2016
Volume
35
Pages
39-46
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W2276169960
Cited by
28
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
  • Aarhus Universitetshospital
  • King's College London
  • European Commission (223290)
  • Universität Zürich
  • Universität Ulm
  • Debreceni Egyetem
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
patient involvement in treatment decisions, shared decision-making, severe mental illness, cross-national differences, cultural factors, patient preferences
MeSH terms
Clinical Decision-Making, Mental Disorders, Decision Making, Europe, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Participation, Physician-Patient Relations, Severity of Illness Index, Patient Satisfaction, Quality Indicators, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review