Cited by 20Pregnancy and Medication ImpactMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy

Perceptions of pregnant women regarding antidepressant and anxiolytic medication use during pregnancy

Kothari, Alka, de Laat, John, Dulhunty, Joel M, Bruxner, George·2019·Australasian Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to explore attitudes and decision-making by pregnant women regarding antidepressant and anxiolytic use during pregnancy. Method: An observational study at an outer metropolitan hospital in Brisbane, Queensland. Pregnant women presenting for their first antenatal clinic visit were invited to complete a questionnaire. Participants were asked about current or previous antidepressant/anxiolytic use, influences on drug decision-making and the adequacy of information received. Perceptions were measured on a 7-point Likert scale. Results: A total of 503 pregnant women were surveyed. The background prevalence of anxiety and depression was 30.0% (151), with 9.3% (47) respondents using antidepressant or anxiolytic medications during the current pregnancy. Of these 47 women, 68% ceased these medications during or while trying to become pregnant, most commonly due to potential side effects to the baby (16), health professional advice (8) and symptomatology that was under control (7). While the effect was modest, decision-making was most strongly influenced by general practitioners, family and the internet. Conclusions: Most women cease antidepressant/anxiolytic medication before and during pregnancy for reasons other than stability of condition. This study reveals an unmet need for accessible reliable information to guide pregnant women and their care providers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1039856218810162

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kothari, A., de Laat, J., Dulhunty, J. M., & Bruxner, G.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Fellow of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Australia
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Redcliffe Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Bruxner, George
Venue
Australasian Psychiatry
Published
2018-11-01
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
117-120
ISSN
  • 1039-8562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1665
OpenAlex
W2899146958
Cited by
20
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australasian Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Redcliffe Hospital Private Practice Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Keywords
antidepressant use during pregnancy, pregnant women's perceptions, medication decision-making, maternal depression, maternal anxiety, drug discontinuation, information needs, prenatal care, general practitioners, family influence, online health information
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Anxiety, Attitude, Counseling, Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Making, Depression, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Queensland, Surveys and Questionnaires, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review