Cited by 1Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Perceived injustice: a historical and clinical review of a useful concept for psychiatry

Open access
Plevin, David, Herriot, Peter·2024·Australasian Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Perceived injustice, a concept that arose in pain medicine, refers to an individual’s experiences and perceptions of victimisation from injuries resulting in chronic pain. Here, we have undertaken a historical and clinical review on the role of perceived injustice medicine in psychiatry and a systematic review on psychotherapeutic interventions for perceived injustice. Method: For the systematic review, two studies were identified from a search of six databases. Results: Though evidence is limited, psychotherapeutic interventions show promise in addressing perceived injustice and associated symptomatology. Conclusion: Perceived injustice is a concept which may have great potential utility to psychiatry, particularly in occupational and medicolegal areas. Interventions addressing perceived injustice may help improve clinical outcomes. © The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists 2023.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10398562231211133

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

6 of 18 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Among patients with advanced lung or prostate cancer, perceived injustice significantly influenced depression and anxiety symptoms, anger at the cancer, and anger at God.

    “In patients with advanced lung and prostate cancer, perceived injustice significantly affected symptoms of depression and anxiety along with anger towards the cancer and anger towards God.11”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] 11. Secinti E, Wu W, Krueger EF, et al. Relations of perceived injustice to psycho-spiritual outcomes in advanced lung and prostate cancer: examining the role of acceptance and meaning making. Psycho-Oncology 2022; 31: 2177-2184. Article. DOI: 10.1002/pon.6065 source

      The Results report significant relationships between perceived injustice and all four outcomes: depressive symptoms, anxiety, anger about cancer, and anger toward God. But the Methods describe a one-time survey, and the Discussion acknowledges that distress might instead contribute to perceived injustice. The claim’s word “affected” implies a causal direction the study does not establish. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Among women with cervical cancer given false-negative smear results, perceived injustice significantly predicted depression and anxiety symptoms.

    “in women with cervical cancer who received falsenegative smear results, perceived injustice was shown to be a significant predictor of symptoms of depression and anxiety.10”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] 10. Lynch J, D'Alton P and Gaynor K. Evaluating the role of perceived injustice in mental health outcomes in cervical cancer care. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30: 6215-6223. Article. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07060-z source
  • Premisecitation

    Among patients with mild traumatic brain injury, perceived injustice correlated significantly with self-reported depressive, post-traumatic stress, pain and post-concussion symptoms.

    “In patients with mild traumatic brain injury, significant correlations were reported between perceived injustice and selfreported depressive, post-traumatic stress, pain and post-concussion symptoms.12”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] 12. Mäki K, Nybo T, Hietanen M, et al. Perceived injustice after mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2022; 37: E157-E164. Article. DOI: 10.1097/HTR. 0000000000000698 source
  • Findingcitation

    In seven women with vulvodynia, a 6- to 7-week therapist-assisted online acceptance and commitment therapy programme led to improvement on perceived injustice measures in three of the seven.

    “Chisari and colleagues, 18 in a cohort of seven women with vulvodynia, assessed a 6-to 7-week program of therapistassisted online acceptance and commitment therapy in seven women with vulvodynia.Three of the seven women had an improvement on measures of perceived injustice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] 18. Chisari C, McCracken LM, Cruciani F, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy for women living with Vulvodynia: a single-case experimental design study of a treatment delivered online. J Context Behav Sci 2022; 23: 15-30. Article. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2021. 11.003 source
  • Premisecitation

    Consulting a lawyer was associated with perceived injustice.

    “One study showed that lawyer consultation was associated with perceived injustice.14”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [14] 14. Ioannou LJ, Cameron PA, Gibson SJ, et al. Traumatic injury and perceived injustice: fault attributions matter in a "no-fault" compensation state. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0178894. Article. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178894 source
  • May combine two claims. 6
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 6
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    In a cohort with musculoskeletal back or neck injury and current work absence (initial pre-dropout n = 66), a 10-week risk-targeted behavioural activation programme with added techniques for perceived injustice and catastrophising produced a large fall in IEQ scores (25%, Cohen's d = 1.0), and change in IEQ correlated positively with change in pain severity, pain catastrophising and depression.

    “In a cohort of individuals with musculoskeletal back or neck injury associated with a current work absence (initial predropout size of 66), Sullivan and colleagues 19 assessed a 10week program of risk-targeted behavioural activation, supplemented by specific techniques to address perceived injustice and catastrophising.”
    • Also stated in: § Systematic review of literature · plain
      “A large reduction in IEQ scores was noted (25%, Cohen's d = 1.0), with change in IEQ being positively correlated with changes in symptom severity for pain, pain catastrophising and depression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] 19. Sullivan MJL, Wideman TH, Gauthier N, et al. Risk-targeted behavioral activation for the management of work disability associated with comorbid pain and depression: a feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2022; 8: 90. Article. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-022-01040-0 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Injustice Experience Questionnaire is a 12-item instrument created to measure perceived injustice.

    “The Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ), a 12-item scale, has been developed to assess perceived injustice.1”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] 1. Sullivan MJL, Adams H, Horan S, et al. The role of perceived injustice in the experience of chronic pain and disability: scale development and validation. J Occup Rehabil 2008; 18: 249-261. Article. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-008-9140-5 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In people with musculoskeletal pain, perceived injustice is generally linked to greater pain intensity, greater disability, worse functional outcomes such as a lower chance of returning to work, and more depressive, post-traumatic stress and anxiety symptoms.

    “perceived injustice has generally been associated with higher pain intensity, higher disability, poorer functional outcomes (such as decreased likelihood of an individual returning to work) and higher levels of psychological symptoms including depressive, post-traumatic stress and anxiety symptoms.9”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] 9. Carriere JS, Pimentel SD, Yakobov E, et al. A systematic review of the association between perceived injustice and pain-related outcomes in individuals with musculo- skeletal pain. Pain Med 2020; 21: 1449-1463. Review. DOI: 10.1093/PM/PNAA088 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Perceived injustice may have considerable potential value for psychiatry, especially in occupational and medicolegal settings, and for medicine more broadly beyond pain medicine.

    “Perceived injustice is a concept which may have great potential utility to psychiatry, particularly in occupational and medicolegal areas.”
    • Also stated in: § Summary · hedged
      “Perceived injustice may be a useful concept with applications beyond the field of pain medicine whence it originated and may have great potential utility to psychiatry as well as medicine more broadly and particularly in the occupational and medicolegal fields.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Perceptions of injustice can arise when an injury results from the faults or omissions of others and the person then suffers loss or deprivation.

    “Perceptions of injustice may arise when an injury has occurred due to the faults or omissions of others, and when an individual subsequently experiences loss or deprivation.1”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] 1. Sullivan MJL, Adams H, Horan S, et al. The role of perceived injustice in the experience of chronic pain and disability: scale development and validation. J Occup Rehabil 2008; 18: 249-261. Article. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-008-9140-5 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Both reviewed studies had methodological weaknesses: neither had a control group, neither used perceived injustice alone as the primary outcome, and both had only short follow-up of perceived injustice measures.

    “neither utilised a control group, neither focused on perceived injustice alone as a primary outcome and both had only limited follow-up for measures of perceived injustice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023386915) and searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Epistemonikos, CINAHL and Mednar.

    “We conducted a systematic review (registered through PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42023386915) of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Epistemonikos, CINAHL and Mednar databases”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Freud observed that people with melancholia seem to feel slighted and treated with great injustice.

    “Freud 5 noted that individuals with melancholia 'always seem as though they felt slighted and had been treated with great injustice'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] 5. Freud S. Mourning and melancholia. In: A Strachey (ed) The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. London, UK: Hogarth Press, 1917, pp. 237-258.

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    IEQ items about blame and unfairness parallel many traumatic disorders, and IEQ items about severity and irreparability parallel almost any psychiatric condition.

    “It is not difficult to draw parallels between items in the IEQ relating to blame and unfairness (e.g.'Nothing will ever make up for what I have gone through' or 'I can't believe this has happened to me') and any number of traumatic disorders, or between those IEQ items relating to severity and irreparability (e.g.'I just want my life back' or 'I worry that my condition is not being taken seriously”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Much psychiatric morbidity results directly from physical or emotional injury.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Legal representatives have an interest in keeping their clients' perceptions of injustice high.

    “'Legal representatives have a vested interest in ensuring that their clients' perceptions of injustice remain high', as Sullivan and colleagues note.16”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] 16. Sullivan MJL, Scott W and Trost Z. Perceived injustice: a risk factor for problematic pain outcomes. Clin J Pain 2012; 28: 484-488. Article. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182527d13 source
10 of 10
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Involvement of lawyers and litigation after injury is linked to worse psychological, functional and pain outcomes.

    “The involvement of lawyers and litigation following injury has been associated with poorer psychological, functional and pain outcomes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Much psychiatric morbidity results directly from physical or emotional injury.

    “Like chronic pain, much psychiatric morbidity is a direct consequence of injury, either physical or emotional.”
2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Database count differs between abstract and methods

    Minor

    The abstract says the review searched six databases, but the methods list seven.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Plevin, D., & Herriot, P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Flinders Medical Centre (AU)
Corresponding author
Plevin, David
Venue
Australasian Psychiatry
Published
2023-10-30
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
41-43
ISSN
  • 1039-8562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1665
OpenAlex
W4388033739
Cited by
1
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australasian Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
perceived injustice, victimization, chronic pain, psychotherapeutic interventions, occupational psychiatry, conceptual history, psychological symptomatology
MeSH terms
Humans, Pain Measurement, Psychiatry, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review