Cited by 11Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic Care

Relations of perceived injustice to psycho‐spiritual outcomes in advanced lung and prostate cancer: Examining the role of acceptance and meaning making

Open access
Secinti, Ekin, Wu, Wei, Krueger, Ellen F., Hirsh, Adam T., Torke, Alexia M., Hanna, Nasser H., Adra, Nabil, Durm, Gregory A. +4 more·2022·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Objective: Many advanced cancer patients struggle with anxiety, depressive symptoms, and anger toward God and illness‐related stressors. Patients may perceive their illness as an injustice (i.e., appraise their illness as unfair, severe, and irreparable or blame others for their illness), which may be a risk factor for poor psychological and spiritual outcomes. This study examined relations between cancer‐related perceived injustice and psycho‐spiritual outcomes as well as potential mediators of these relationships. Methods: Advanced lung (n = 102) and prostate (n = 99) cancer patients completed a one‐time survey. Using path analyses, we examined a parallel mediation model including the direct effects of perceived injustice on psycho‐spiritual outcomes (i.e., anxiety, depressive symptoms, anger about cancer, anger towards God) and the indirect effects of perceived injustice on psycho‐spiritual outcomes through two parallel mediators: meaning making and acceptance of cancer. We then explored whether these relations differed by cancer type. Results: Path analyses indicated that perceived injustice was directly and indirectly—through acceptance of cancer but not meaning making—associated with psycho‐spiritual outcomes. Results did not differ between lung and prostate cancer patients. Conclusions: Advanced cancer patients with greater perceived injustice are at higher risk for poor psycho‐spiritual outcomes. Acceptance of cancer, but not meaning making, explained relationships between cancer‐related perceived injustice and psycho‐spiritual outcomes. Findings support testing acceptance‐based interventions to address perceived injustice in advanced cancer patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.6065

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among patients with advanced lung or prostate cancer, perceived injustice significantly influenced depression and anxiety symptoms, anger at the cancer, and anger at God.

    “In patients with advanced lung and prostate cancer, perceived injustice significantly affected symptoms of depression and anxiety along with anger towards the cancer and anger towards God.11”

    From Perceived injustice: a historical and clinical review of a useful concept for psychiatry (2024) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results report significant relationships between perceived injustice and all four outcomes: depressive symptoms, anxiety, anger about cancer, and anger toward God. But the Methods describe a one-time survey, and the Discussion acknowledges that distress might instead contribute to perceived injustice. The claim’s word “affected” implies a causal direction the study does not establish. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Acceptance is the central mediating process in the adjustment process between perceived injustice and psychosocial outcomes.

    “In their model, the association between perceived injustice and psychosocial outcomes was mediated by acceptance (not meaning making), suggesting that acceptance is the central mediating process in this adjustment process.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Secinti, E., Wu, W., Krueger, E. F., Hirsh, A. T., Torke, A. M., Hanna, N. H., Adra, N., Durm, G. A., Einhorn, L., Pili, R., Jalal, S. I., & Mosher, C. E.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychology Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis Indianapolis Indiana USA
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
  • Indiana University Health (US)
  • Department of Medicine Indiana University School of Medicine Indianapolis Indiana USA
  • Department of Medicine Jacobs School of Medicine & Biomedical Sciences University at Buffalo Buffalo New York USA
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-11-11
Volume
31
Issue
12
Pages
2177-2184
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W4308366966
Cited by
11
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute
  • Walther Cancer Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
perceived injustice, advanced cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, meaning-making, anxiety, depressive symptoms, illness-related stress, acceptance-based interventions
MeSH terms
Anger, Anxiety, Humans, Lung, Male, Prostatic Neoplasms, Surveys and Questionnaires, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review