Cited by 130Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Defining Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature

Trevino, Kenneth, McClintock, Shawn M., Fischer, Noelle McDonald, Vora, Ankita, Husain, Mustafa M.·2014·Annals of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Despite the common occurrence and debilitating nature of treatment-resistant depression (TRD), currently there is no universally accepted definition for TRD. This review summarizes the different methods used to define TRD, and provides an overview of the TRD literature. Methods: PsycInfo, Medline, and Ovid were searched to identify relevant articles published in peer-reviewed journals. A combination and/or variation of the following keywords were searched: treatment resistant , treatment refractory , depression , defining , staging , and modeling . Identified articles provided a description of the methods utilized for defining and/or measuring TRD, prevalence and impact of TRD, risk factors for TRD, and/or factors that contribute to the misclassification of non-TRD patients. Results: Multiple methods for defining/measuring TRD have been proposed; however, variability in these methods has limited the comparability between TRD studies. Although various risk factors for TRD have been suggested, few have been consistently supported. The misclassification of non-TRD patients as having TRD is related to various clinical and treatment-related factors. Conclusions: Adopting a universal standard definition for TRD is necessary to reduce the variability in how TRD is defined, and the misclassification of non-TRD patients. A universal definition would benefit clinical and research settings by allowing data to be easily compared across these settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/104012371402600310

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trevino, K., McClintock, S. M., Fischer, N. M., Vora, A., & Husain, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Neurostimulation Research Lab Department of Psychiatry University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas, USA
  • Duke University (US)
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Venue
Annals of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2014-08
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
222-232
ISSN
  • 1040-1237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-3325
OpenAlex
W2291794699
Cited by
130
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH067543)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
treatment-resistant depression
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Diagnostic Errors, Humans, Severity of Illness Index, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review