Cited by 596Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesInnovation and Knowledge ManagementMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy

Many are Called, but Few are Chosen: An Evolutionary Perspective for the Study of Entrepreneurship

Aldrich, Howard E., Martinez, Martha Argelia·2001·Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice

Abstract

More than a decade ago, Low and MacMillan identified three elements indispensable to an understanding of entrepreneurial success: process, context, and outcomes. Since their critique, three important advances include (a) a shift in theoretical emphasis from the characteristics of entrepreneurs as individuals to the consequences of their actions, (b) a deeper understanding of how entrepreneurs use knowledge, networks, and resources to construct firms, and (c) a more sophisticated taxonomy of environmental forces at different levels of analysis (population, community, and society) that affect entrepreneurship. Although our knowledge of entrepreneurial activities has increased dramatically, we still have much to learn about how process and context interact to shape the outcome of entrepreneurial efforts. From an evolutionary approach, process and context (strategy and environment) interact in a recursive continuous process, driving the fate of entrepreneurial efforts. Thus, integrating context and process into research designs remains a major challenge. Such integration constitutes a necessary step to a more complete evolutionary approach and a better understanding of entrepreneurial success.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/104225870102500404

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recursive continuous process of interaction between ecosystems, processes, and outputs/outcomes shapes the ecosystem and the conditions for entrepreneurs.

    “It is this 'recursive continuous process' of interaction between ecosystems (context), processes, and outputs/outcomes that shape the ecosystem and the conditions for entrepreneurs ( Aldrich & Martinez, 2001).”

    From Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program (2022) · cites this paper as Aldrich & Martinez, 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
Published
2001-07
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
41-56
ISSN
  • 1042-2587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6520
OpenAlex
W4240704148
Cited by
596
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 21
FWCI
27.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Keywords
entrepreneurship, evolutionary theory, entrepreneurial success, entrepreneurial outcomes, environmental forces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review