Cited by 47Entrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesMigration, Ethnicity, and EconomySleep and related disorders

The Weary Founder: Sleep Problems, ADHD-Like Tendencies, and Entrepreneurial Intentions

Open access
Gunia, Brian C., Gish, J. Jeffrey, Mensmann, Mona·2021·Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice

Abstract

Scholars have persuasively documented the positive influence of ADHD-like tendencies (the impermanent experience of ADHD-like symptoms) on entrepreneurial intentions. Yet, we know little about the causes of ADHD-like tendencies, and thus about factors that could heighten entrepreneurial intentions through such tendencies. Drawing from the biopsychosocial model, sleep physiology literature, and entrepreneurship literature, we propose that the biological experience of sleep problems may heighten the psychological experience of ADHD-like tendencies, which could nudge people toward the socially-embedded intention to venture. Four studies and a mini meta-analysis provide support, extending several literatures and suggesting that sleep problems could contribute to business founding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1042258720940502

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prolific Academic allows specification of comprehensive and rigorous pre-screening criteria that ensure recruited respondents are appropriate for the study.

    “Additionally, unlike other online platforms (e.g., MTurk), Prolific allows for the specification of comprehensive and rigorous pre-screening criteria that permits us to ensure that the recruited respondents are appropriate for our study.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 123 · Cited by 47

Authors
Gunia, B. C., Gish, J. J., & Mensmann, M.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Gunia, Brian C.
Venue
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
Published
2020-08-12
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
175-210
ISSN
  • 1042-2587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6520
OpenAlex
W3048391303
Cited by
47
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
sleep disorders, entrepreneurial intention, business founding, biopsychosocial model, sleep physiology, ADHD symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review