The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Devices for Recharging Batteries
Abstract
Piezoelectric materials can be used as a means of transforming ambient vibrations into electrical energy that can then be stored and used to power other devices. With the recent surge of microscale devices, piezoelectric power generation can provide a convenient alternative to traditional power sources used to operate certain types of sensors/actuators, telemetry, and MEMS devices. However, the energy produced by these materials is in many cases far too small to directly power an electrical device. Therefore, much of the research into power harvesting has focused on methods of accumulating the energy until a sufficient amount is present, allowing the intended electronics to be powered. In a recent study by Sodano et al. (2004a) the ability to take the energy generated through the vibration of a piezoelectric material was shown to be capable of recharging a discharged nickel metal hydride battery. In the present study, three types of piezoelectric devices are investigated and experimentally tested to determine each of their abilities to transform ambient vibration into electrical energy and their capability to recharge a discharged battery. The three types of piezoelectric devices tested are the commonly used monolithic piezoceramic material lead–zirconate–titanate (PZT), the bimorph Quick Pack (QP) actuator, and the macro-fiber composite (MFC). The experimental results estimate the efficiency of the three devices tested and identify the feasibility of their use in practical applications. Different capacity batteries are recharged using each device, to determine the charge time and maximum capacity battery that can be charged. The results presented in this article provide a means of choosing the piezoelectric device to be used and estimate the amount of time required to recharge a specific capacity battery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human-powered wearable computing
Starner, T. (1996) · IBM Systems Journal · doi:10.1147/sj.353.0618 · Cited by 876
Cited by
Energy harvesting vibration sources for microsystems applications
Beeby, S. P., Tudor, M. J., & White, N. M. (2006) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0957-0233/17/12/r01 · Cited by 3,008
A review of piezoelectric energy harvesting based on vibration
Kim, H. S., Kim, J.-H., & Kim, J. (2011) · International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s12541-011-0151-3 · Cited by 1,121
A piezoelectric fibre composite based energy harvesting device for potential wearable applications
Swallow, L. M., Luo, J. K., Siores, E., Patel, I., & Dodds, D. (2008) · Smart Materials and Structures · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/17/2/025017 · Cited by 208
Modelling piezoelectric energy harvesting potential in an educational building
Li, X., & Strezov, V. (2014) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.096 · Cited by 84
Zhu, D., & Beeby, S. (2011) · Energy Harvesting Systems · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7566-9_1 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Sodano, H. A., Inman, D. J., & Park, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 799-807
- ISSN
- 1045-389X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8138
- OpenAlex
- W2028286412
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Devices for Recharging Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1045389x05056681
- The paper
- Sodano, H. A., Inman, D. J., & Park, G. (2005). Comparison of Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Devices for Recharging Batteries. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389x05056681
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.