The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Further Understanding of Trust and Performance in Virtual Teams
Abstract
Trust has been deemed to be critical in ensuring the efficient operation of virtual teams and organizations. This study empirically verifies ability and integrity as being antecedents of trust formation in virtual teams. However, effective team performance was found to be independent of the formation of trust. Further analysis suggests that information symmetry and good communication distinguish high performance teams from low performance teams.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations
McAllister, D. J. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256727 · Cited by 7,346
Developmental sequence in small groups.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0022100 · Cited by 5,778
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited
Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. C. (1977) · Group & Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/105960117700200404 · Cited by 2,679
Cited by
Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here?
Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.05.002 · Cited by 1,314
Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams
Jarvenpaa, S. L., Shaw, T. R., & Staples, D. S. (2004) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0028 · Cited by 773
Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates.
De Jong, B. A., Dirks, K. T., & Gillespie, N. (2016) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000110 · Cited by 616
Individual Swift Trust and Knowledge-Based Trust in Face-to-Face and Virtual Team Members
Robert, L. P., Denis, A. R., & Hung, Y.-T. C. (2009) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222260210 · Cited by 514
Virtual team effectiveness: The role of knowledge sharing and trust
Alsharo, M., Gregg, D., & Ramirez, R. (2017) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.10.005 · Cited by 329
Swift Trust in Global Virtual Teams: Trusting Beliefs and Normative Actions
Crisp, C. B., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2013) · Journal of Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000075 · Cited by 256
A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams
Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., DeChurch, L. A., Jimenez-Rodriguez, M., Wildman, J., & Shuffler, M. (2011) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.002 · Cited by 234
How to Evaluate Trust in AI-Assisted Decision Making? A Survey of Empirical Methodologies
Vereschak, O., Bailly, G., & Caramiaux, B. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3476068 · Cited by 229
Peñarroja, V., Orengo, V., Zornoza, A., & Hernández, A. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.020 · Cited by 89
The Moderating Effects of Virtuality on the Antecedents and Outcome of NPD Team Trust
Bierly, P. E., Stark, E. M., & Kessler, E. H. (2009) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00680.x · Cited by 85
The effect of voice and humour on users’ perceptions of personal intelligent agents
Moussawi, S., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2021) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2020.1772368 · Cited by 83
An Exploratory Study of Trust Dynamics in Work-Oriented Virtual Teams
Kuo, F.-Y., & Yu, C.-P. (2009) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01472.x · Cited by 60
Lauring, J., Drogendijk, R., & Kubovcikova, A. (2022) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2021.1960584 · Cited by 38
Trust and decision-making: An empirical platform (CCP 204)
Lyons, J., Stokes, C., Garcia, D., Adams, J., & Ames, D. (2009) · IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/maes.2009.5317785 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Aubert, B. A., & Kelsey, B. L.
- Venue
- Small Group Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 575-618
- ISSN
- 1046-4964 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8278
- OpenAlex
- W2119169479
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
