Cited by 105Pediatric Pain Management TechniquesChildren's Rights and ParticipationPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Chronic pain in childhood and the medical encounter: Professional ventriloquism and hidden voices

Carter, Bernie·2002·Qualitative Health Research

Abstract

This article is a report on the experiences of three children with chronic pain and their families. The children and families experienced numerous encounters with health professionals during their "quest for a diagnosis"for chronic pain. In a high proportion of these encounters, the children/families felt they were judged, disbelieved, and labeled as difficult or dysfunctional, and this compounded the stresses they were already dealing with. The families described situations in which their accounts of pain were reinterpreted through a variety of professional lenses, and the children felt that their voices were muted or ignored. Professional ventriloquism is presented as a means of exploring the way in which the child's words are reinterpreted and mistranslated through professionals' own paradigms of understanding. Professionals need to stand back from what they believe to determine what the children themselves know about their pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/104973230201200103

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carter, B.
Affiliations
University of Lancashire (GB)
Corresponding author
Carter, Bernie
Venue
Qualitative Health Research
Published
2002-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
28-41
ISSN
  • 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7557
OpenAlex
W2131865090
Cited by
105
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Qualitative Health Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (submittedVersion)
  • Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
pediatric chronic pain, healthcare encounters, patient voice, misdiagnosis, family experiences, patient-professional relationship
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Attitude of Health Personnel, Child, Psychology, Child, Chronic Disease, Communication, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Female, Health Services Research, Humans, Judgment, Male, Medical History Taking, Pain, Physician-Patient Relations, Professional-Family Relations, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review