Cited by 162Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareChronic Disease Management StrategiesDiabetes Management and Education

Uncovering the Limits of Patient-Centeredness: Implementing a Self-Management Trial for Chronic Illness

Rogers, Anne, Kennedy, Anne, Nelson, Elizabeth, Robinson, Andrew·2005·Qualitative Health Research

Abstract

Research evaluating self-management of chronic conditions points to the effectiveness of interventions’ changing the health behavior of individuals. However, we know little about how self-management is negotiated within health services. The authors designed a qualitative investigation to illuminate the quantitative findings of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a self-management program for people with inflammatory bowel disease. They conducted in-depth interviews with physicians and patients, and qualitative analysis illuminated the nature of doctor-patient encounters and possible reasons for lack of change in patient satisfaction with the consultation. The findings suggest that factors inhibiting effective patient-centered consultations include failure of physicians to incorporate expressed need relevant to people’s self-management activities fully, interpretation of selfmanagement as compliance with medical instructions, and the organization of outpatients’ clinics. Giving attention to these barriers might maximize the opportunities for patient selfmanagement of chronic illness based on a therapeutic alliance with health care professionals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049732304272048

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deep rooted communication issues such as differential mental health models, perceived candidacy for treatment and recursivity in cultural expectations of treatment exist in both groups.

    “A marked difference between groups included meeting the language needs of some minority patients, however deep rooted communication issues such as differential mental health models [21], perceived candidacy for treatment [22] and recursivity in cultural expectations of treatment [23] exist in both groups [8].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogers, A., Kennedy, A., Nelson, E., & Robinson, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Salford Royal Hospital (GB)
Venue
Qualitative Health Research
Published
2005-02
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
224-239
ISSN
  • 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7557
OpenAlex
W2111156635
Cited by
162
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
12.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Qualitative Health Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
patient-centered care, self-management, chronic disease, inflammatory bowel disease, doctor-patient encounters, therapeutic relationship, patient satisfaction, physician-patient communication, barriers to self-management, health behavior change
MeSH terms
Adult, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Professional-Patient Relations, Self Care, Social Support, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Health Behavior, Patient-Centered Care, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review