Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Understanding Qualitative Metasynthesis: Issues and Opportunities in Early Childhood Intervention Research

Erwin, Elizabeth J., Brotherson, Mary Jane, Summers, Jean Ann·2011·Journal of Early Intervention

Abstract

Qualitative metasynthesis is an intentional and coherent approach to analyzing data across qualitative studies. It is a process that enables researchers to identify a specific research question and then search for, select, appraise, summarize, and combine qualitative evidence to address the research question. This process uses rigorous qualitative methods to synthesize existing qualitative studies to construct greater meaning through an interpretative process. The purpose of this article is to describe qualitative metasynthesis as an innovative research approach for the field of early childhood intervention. Although this is not a new research approach in other fields, the authors suggest that it can offer a promising practice in the field of early childhood intervention. In this article, the authors explore how qualitative metasynthesis can be a practical and effective approach of inquiry as they continue to broaden their understanding about young children with disabilities and their families.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1053815111425493

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 10.1177/105381519902200403 · doi:10.1177/105381519902200403
  2. 10.1177/0271121410363400 · doi:10.1177/0271121410363400
  3. Hundersmarck S. (in press). Is synthesizing qualitative research possible? A study about the process of synthesizing qualitative studies in the field of education using three alternative forms of synthesis. Qualitative Report.
  4. 10.3104/reports.103 · doi:10.3104/reports.103
  5. 10.1177/1053815109354698 · doi:10.1177/1053815109354698
  6. 10.1177/105381510002300202 · doi:10.1177/105381510002300202
  7. 10.1177/105381518901300407 · doi:10.1177/105381518901300407
  8. 10.2511/rpsd.28.3.148 · doi:10.2511/rpsd.28.3.148
  9. Schorr L., 2007, Paper presented at the meeting of the National Working Group, National Alliance of Children’s Trust & Prevention Funds
  10. Summers J. A., Brotherson M. J., Naig L., Ethridge B., Singer G. H., Kruse A., Wang W. (2008, March). A preliminary synthesis of qualitative research: Gaining emotional well-being from other parents. Paper presented at the Beach Center on Disability State of the Science Conference, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.beachcenter.org/Wisdom/EmotionalWellBeing/WisdomRP2_SummaryofQuanMetaAnalysis_April08.pdf
  11. Wesley P. W., 2006, Evidence-based practice in the early childhood field, 161
  12. Winton P., 2006, Evidence-based practice in the early childhood field, 71

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Erwin, E. J., Brotherson, M. J., & Summers, J. A.
Venue
Journal of Early Intervention
Published
2011-09
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
186-200
ISSN
  • 1053-8151 (ISSN-L)
  • 2154-3992
OpenAlex
W2038255840
Cited by
272
References
43
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding Qualitative Metasynthesis: Issues and Opportunities in Early Childhood Intervention Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1053815111425493
The paper
Erwin, E. J., Brotherson, M. J., & Summers, J. A. (2011). Understanding Qualitative Metasynthesis: Issues and Opportunities in Early Childhood Intervention Research. Journal of Early Intervention. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815111425493

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.